Page Content (OCR)
wave behavior of “quantum entities” is generated only by the fact that two spatial fractals meet. We usually see matter in terms of space, since we see objects in 3D space. Regardless of the size of these objects (large, small, minuscule), we tend to reproduce and apply our thought pattern to the infinitely small, like Aristotle and, in more recent times, Rutherford did. In fact, it is incorrect to speak of infinitely small or infinitely large. The princi- ple of 3D time marks the end of infinites, because we change fractals every time we approach infinity until quantum entanglement allows us to reach the unity of all. In a way, it conceals the presence of limited microscopic observation leading to the idea of the continuity of princi- ples, regardless of the observed scale. However, the presence of quan- tum electrodynamics cutoffs, for example, is a strong indication of discontinuity. Nothing in our current knowledge allows us to disprove the idea that we may have to take a leap to bridge the gap between the princi- ples of quantum mechanics and the content of immeasurably smaller scales, of very high temporal densities. Let us return to Smolin’s the- ory. All things considered, the differences could be just as big as the ones that exist between classical physics and quantum physics. This could be called metaphysics, i.e., global physics, or even knowledge of the first principles. I think these causes are non-causes because of quantum entanglement, i.e., the intervention of sheer will originated in the unity of the nature of particles that we separate both conceptually and sensorily (spatial scale shift). We can either undergo or choose the te. causal fate. These principles are provided by absolute relativity. Addressing these principles means we also need to address the study of the EPR paradox. In 1935, Einstein, Rosen and Podolski (EPR) introduced a thought experiment arguing that quantum mechanics is not a complete physi- cal theory. It is still considered one of the greatest paradoxes in the his- tory of science, similar to the wave-corpuscule duality in more general terms. They considered a two-particle system after interaction and sep- aration, depicted as a single wave function. In other words, if the veloc- ity or position of one of the two particles is measured, the velocity or position of the other is automatically known. The authors concluded that the velocity and position of both particles were well defined prior to measurement based on the reality principle. In quantum physics, the velocities and positions are undetermined before measurement and it is the actual measurement performed on the 260 The Science of Extraterrestrials: UFOs Explained at Last * Eric Julien