Page Content (OCR)
invisible). You should take into account that countless gamma-ray flashes have been registered i in the cosmos since the Cold War travel- ing in all directions around the Earth, at least one per day on average. Do these intense flashes have a distant or nearby source? The truth is that this remains a mystery. It is argued, probably justly so, that almost seventy-five percent of these bursts are of extragalactic origins. They are associated with supernovae transformed into neutron stars. How- ever, only some thirty out of tens of thousands of flashes have been studied. In the year 2000, NASA registered approximately three thou- sand flashes showing huge energy levels. Do not forget that the thesis of objects moving away from the source is related to the standard Big Bang model. It is only logical that one of the models used specifically to explain flashes refers to the collapse of a star to a black hole. Quan- tum physicists think they can identify these famous black holes by reducing them to a much smaller version — in other words, by pene- trating still further into the structure of matter — in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) project scheduled at CERN in 2007. However, the proposed and generally accepted model is impaired”: “an as yet unappreciated mechanism causes part of the accretion energy to transform into ejection energy.” Yes, you are reading cor- rectly. How can a powerful mechanism that pulls in matter also eject it? In other words, matter located beyond the Schwarzchild radius circling around the black hole, using a sufficient amount of energy extracted from the plane of rotation and therefore from the centripetal force and directed to one of the black hole poles, allegedly causes spectacular col- lisions similar to the birth of the universe. If we follow this imaginary experiment and accepting this model for a moment, the question is why these collisions produce gamma rays? How do we explain low- energy bursts, such as GRB031203, that are inevitably closer by? What about the shortest flashes that are incompatible with this model; bursts of which we have only been able to locate a single one so far? Why are the curves of visible light and gamma rays of these bursts non-corre- lated? I would like to invite astronomers who say they have never seen a flying saucer to solve this enigma. We might just as well acknowl- edge that the temporal density changes realized by ET vessels, which may seem brief from our point of view, produce these gamma-ray bursts, including remanence effects and temporal delay. The huge amount of energy observed would then be caused by the extreme prox- imity in the sky of the source of these flashes. In other words, it is quite possible that invisible vessels fly around the Earth leaving traces of 244 The Science of Extraterrestrials: UFOs Explained at Last * Eric Julien