Page Content (OCR)
the chance that the system-object can resist the laws of evolution lead- ing to more information diminishes. If space is fractal, it expresses itself by using the systems of creation. Every system is not a perfect represen- tation of its fractality or every object would look fractal, such as ferns. Systems do only what they were designed to do. The already acknowledged principle of least action therefore consists in multiply- ing the occurrences that inform a system without passing through space and producing a great deal of S actions, but through time. It is therefore easier to create the system while keeping its function intact. This so-called redundancy can be found in every information system. It is present in the security systems of airplanes, where alarms are dou- bled, tripled and even quadrupled, and basically in every complex and intelligent system. The complexity and intelligence are translated by a network that decreasingly uses physical links, and therefore space quanta, in favor of accelerated time. In other words, the more time there is, the less space there is. Nonetheless, everything is subject to scales, the absolute values of which remain to be determined. It is clear that exotic matter used by ETs, for example, is a material system with potentially more than seven spatial iterations exceeding the threshold of c. This property allows them to dematerialize. Let us return to rewriting the value of c. rout 1 1 tad c ao 4 In the same way and in accordance with the aforementioned equa- tion, c tends towards zero when t, moves towards infinity (and towards the infinitely small). We have seen that c is constant for a given horizon, that of the observer. The problem is to determine the value of a space quantum number and a time quantum number. The choice of Planck scales seems a first possibility, but may not necessar- od eet ily be sufficient. Many ask if it makes sense to think that in the absence of space, time could still exist and even increase. As long as we think solely in terms of motion, the answer is no. In terms of information, the answer is yes. Do not forget that motion is changing information, but only from our perspective. Motion is nothing other than a specific type of information. The question is what the information looks like when it is not subject to motion. It constitutes the quantum memory of all that ever was, is and will be. This memory is reality, whereas motion is sub- jectivity stretched out by fractal unfolding. Consciousness thus becomes a receptacle of one or every piece of information for the pur- pose of choice, contemplation or being. After this indispensable digression, let us study the nature of so- called weighty mass by returning to the Compton wavelength: 220 The Science of Extraterrestrials: UFOs Explained at Last * Eric Julien