Page Content (OCR)
particle can be the horizon of internal constituents and its horizon can be also a constituent of an external horizon.” So particle = horizon and horizon = two particles twice as small. The term particle is used here in a broad sense. It can be a planet or a proton. In other words, the con- tainer is always the content of a larger container, and the content is always the container of other smaller contents. This physicist linked up time and space, defining time as a periodic motion of a space in the horizon of the observer. The figures he used in his theory describe the particle motions according to the scale in which they are observed in relation to sequential particles-containers. Time dilation occurs at the exact point where a particle crosses a curved line and another crosses a straight line. In this sense, a horizon is an observation boundary and the interactions demarcate time flow tot. a aad woe on . 1 . aoa doubling time elapses more quickly than time on the scale in question. As a consequence: “this anticipation, for which the first rigorous defi- nition was established by Robert Rosen, can therefore be considered the result of a doubling of space and time.” Garnier Malet’s reference to temporal relativity hinges on the embedding of horizons or particles, which explains why discrete time is dependent on the viewpoint of the observer. This adds considerable weight to the idea that, from time to time, time flows as described above, in the same way as intuition leads us there: “‘with discontinuous energies and masses in a discontinuous universe, a discontinuous time seems logical. Thus, Heisenberg’s uncertainty relations (AEAt 2 h/470) and Einstein’s equation (E=Mc’) would use only discontinuous and quantifiable sizes. Einstein talked about time as a succession of woud tow " . tea a tad c moments, but he never used a time discontinuity that is the cause of relativity.” Therefore, the exchanges of interactions would correspond to time accelerations and decelerations. This concurs with Kozyrev’s observa- tions. He showed that time was rarer near a cause and denser near an effect. This remarkable fact is the result of the doubling generating pos- sible exchanges of trajectories (and therefore information) between internal particles (accelerated time) and external particles (decelerated time). Slowly but surely, our ability to change our macroscopic world by intentional and mental anticipation is being revealed. Of course, this exchange will remain unobservable since it takes place in the acceler- ated time of a horizon characterized as virtual by Garnier Malet, in the c te a : toa eat 1 ‘ vat deviations. Similarly, the result of an interaction can be anticipated as sense of unreal from the viewpoint of the observer (and his measuring instrument).