Page Content (OCR)
In his article he presented a series of very important tables. Based on the previous equations, he proved the existence of ratios of permanent natural phenomena (stationary), such as planetary orbits to the electron Compton wavelength, and electron rest energy to the energy of the cos- mological essence of radiation (3K-background radiation). One might note that these phenomena both originate from the microscopic and the macroscopic universe. An underlying temporal law therefore crosses the spatial scales, showing that M must be of the form: M=N/3 A/B = 2? period-doubling system in the case of permanent phenomena. These calculations prove extremely close to observational data obtained via the classical method of one-dimensional time. Nevertheless, Lehto deduced the three-dimensionality of time from the only asymmetry that exists between space and time. He did not provide specific defi- nitions for these dimensions, as length, width and height are given with regard to space. Therefore, his consideration of values 0, 1/3 and 2/3, derived from the calculations in line with the observations, seems the theoretical foundation of this three-dimensionality, which he pre- sented as degrees (3) of freedom of time. Lehto limited this freedom to the permanent physical entities (stationary in time) he related to period-doubling phenomena (harmonic oscillatory of “binder” 2). Lehto stressed that both Einstein (E=Mc’) and Planck (E=hf) consid- ered energy a scalar quantity that has a magnitude, but not a direction. According to them and to Lehto, energy is therefore not vectorial, as in space vectors. Lehto discovered that time is needed to define particle kinematics (such as macroscopic objects) and that dynamics is a one- dimensional flow from the viewpoint of the observer. As a conse- quence, he felt 3D time cannot be considered a generalization of one-dimensional time. His mathematical model is therefore based only re rr a re ee tats 1 on a cubical lattice, the constant of which increases with integral pow- ers of 2. The unitary scale used is that of time and the Planck length. Furthermore, Lehto emphasized that quantum numbers can theo- retically take any non-imaginary value. In practice, these are often powers of 2. They are called values of the second kind. Lehto described where N is an integer. This means that the A and B ratio is as follows: Lehto showed that this relation is true for a three-dimensional,