Page Content (OCR)
I think the superposition of quanta is due only to the observation of a fractal seen from another fractal, which results in the absence of phys- ical causality at certain levels. The void is simply the center of superior fractals that are inaccessible from our macroscopic space-time, where mental energy (a new form of causality) is rooted. In response to Ein- stein, who said that “God does not play dice,” this book shows that “God has given the dice to His creatures to be in His image.” Interestingly, Kozyrev’s experimental work demonstrated a relation between harmonics and the weight changes and deviations, which deter- mined the validity of the fractal nature of time. It is a fact that the harmon- ics, being natural and complete frequency multipliers, do not correspond to the incomplete fractal dimension but to the “magnification factor” in logarithm q (homothety). Therefore, the resonance of any vibrating objects affects the time flow of these objects. This does not apply only to quantum mechanics, it also applies to our macroscopic world. Finally, we should credit Kozyrev for deriving the relation between time and parapsychological aptitude: “It is possible that our psycho- logical perception of temporal void or of substantial time is not only of a subjective nature, such as the perception of time flux, but also an objective physical foundation.” This seemingly anodyne phrase inflicted in reality a “scientific blow” to human sciences that Kozyrev did not exploit in his article. In matters of ufology, the psycho-sociological hypothesis is about to collapse like a house of cards. It is becoming but a simple antedilu- vian belief in comparison with the fantastic powers of the nature of space-time, being the heart of all information in the visible and invis- ible universe. Like Kozyrev, L. S. Shikhobalov wanted to know what can be obtained from a substantial conception of time.” The Russian scientist referred to an old opposition between a relational and a substantial conception of time. He wrote: “According to the first one, there exists no time ‘per se’ in nature and time is no more than a relation (or a set of relations) between physical events. In other words, time is a specific manifestation of the properties of physical bodies and changes occur- ring in them. The second conception, the substantial one, assumes, vice versa, that time is an independent phenomenon of nature, a specific kind of substance, coexisting with space, matter and physical fields. The relational conception of time is conventionally associated with the names of Aristotle, G. W. Leibnitz and A. Einstein. The most ardent adherents of the substantial conception of time are Democritus, I. New- anr A ow ” ton and N. A. Kozyrev.”