Page 161 of 400
time,” and vice versa. Chance is the translation of the relevance of time in phenomenology. To be more exact, it follows from the comparison of a fast time flow in another, slower time flow. In the microscopic world, time is preponderant. In the macroscopic world, space is preponderant. Therefore, the real problem is finding out what the probabilistic nature of units of measure (position, energy, etc.) intrinsically repre- sents. It is not enough to say: “the probability of this happening is...” We must be able to explain why the probabilistic mechanism itself has to take place. Let me illustrate this comment. All the grains of sand in an hourglass cannot fall through the aperture at the same time because it is too narrow. It is this narrowness that prevents us from being aware of every “action” at the same time. The great difficulty in precognition experiences is to ascertain whether the information obtained from the future (in the upper part of the hourglass) regards the person consult- ing or someone else, or, in case of sufficient empathy between the seer and the person consulting, whether the predicted events follow a pre- cise chronology. In other words, does the sand come from the right, the left or the middle? 3D time is not opposed to the experiments conducted in physics, but to their interpretation. In other words, some scientists have the question right in front of them without bothering to find an answer. It is therefore enough to simply study quantum mechanics to find out what it wants to tell us. Even the most experienced physicists never explained the relevance of this probability. The explanation is very simple for those who apply 3D time. There exists a time flow in the microscopic world that is so radically different from ours (because it possesses such a large quantity of information), that the measurement performed in the macroscopic world (hybrid wave function between the measured particle and the measuring instrument) has to take into account the probability that the measured physical magnitude is more or less close to the common tem- poral coordinate between the microscopic and the macroscopic. In other words, will the grain of sand follow a vertical trajectory to reach the aperture of the hourglass or not? You can try all you like to get all the rain to fall (time on the microscopic scale) in a glass (time on the macroscopic scale), but the latter will not be able to contain it all at the same time. Everything outside the glass is potential energy for the glass, i.e., the whole of probabilities of position, energy, etc. These probabilities really exist on the scale of microscopic time. They are not exactly probabilities anymore, but events out of reach of our percep- tion, including the perception of our measuring instruments. What is The metaphysics of space-times 153