Page Content (OCR)
However, it is quite possible that it will soon crumble at the edges. A fact is a fact. Everything we see of the universe happens today and on Earth! The history of the universe is based merely on speculation. The cosmological principle that is supposed to reflect the universe about three hundred thousand years after the Big Bang is nothing other than the extrapolation of the radiation existing today! Inflation, which allegedly explains the first moments of the world, does not at all fit in the theoretical framework of particle physics and will also, quite understandably, never be justifiable in laboratories. First of all, physicists do not know every existing particle typology in the universe (particularly when we discover some that are not sup- posed to exist). Secondly, they do not know the number and distribu- tion of black holes, essential factors presumably playing a role in gravity. The calculation of homogeneity and isotropy takes place in the observable universe instead of the entire universe. Actually, there is not enough observable matter to take into account the dilation of the uni- toad a : toa eat oom verse, probably because the universe simply does not dilate at all! In cosmology, the principle of Occam’s razor seems to be used with...reluctance. At this time, there is no objective reason to assume that the seventy percent of missing mass are uniformly spread since their location is unknown. The discovery of dark matter should have refuted the Big Bang model. To save it, however, cosmologists hold onto the concept of unseen, hypothetical, exotic matter to avoid explaining that, in the opposite situation, an enormous quantity of deuterium (hydrogen isotope) should have been produced by the pri- mordial universe, which is inconsistent with the model itself. Observations of distant supernovae suggest that the universe is in accelerated expansion, as they proved less bright than the standard model anticipated. For the universe to be in accelerated expansion, a new form of energy called dark energy is required, which has never been seen other than in speculations made by those who support the Big Bang model. This decrease in brightness could quite simply be explained by galactic dust produced by condensation of iron needles in supernovae remnants, as the Indian astrophysicist Jayant V. Narlikar proposed; a phenomenon confirmed by laboratory experiments. He also argued that the Big Bang does not explain why a redshift deviation exists between two galaxies materially connected by a filament. The probability of this being part of some smart backup plan is extremely low. Redshifts are one of the principles of the prevailing model. This astrophysicist regretted the arrogance of those in favor of the standard Big Bang model, which he compared to religious fanaticism. 146 The Science of Extraterrestrials: UFOs Explained at Last * Eric Julien