Page Content (OCR)
heart of the symmetry phenomenon. That is why we need to experi- ment and learn that we mentally build the course of time from what we learn in life (evolution by learning). This is the true meaning of individ- ual and collective learning, the fundamental form of the evolutionary archetype that sends the idea of dynamics and therefore of time flow- ing in the direction of progress, back to the universe. This need comes from our sense of separation. The Big Bang would be impossible from this point of view alone. At the end of the article, Albert said that there exists ‘““a certain number of suggestions aimed at changing quantum mechanics in such a way that this kind of interpretations [note: inter- vention of consciousness due to the psychological experience of a physical phenomenon] becomes valid. Some of these proposals demand that fundamental equations take a statistical form and do not behave like invariants during a temporal inversion.” As I said before: everything boils down to statistics, because everything depends on the degree of freedom accessed by the consciousness that observes the world! That is why causality is variable! Indeed, the absence of invari- ance of the T symmetry decimates a great many certainties. Syn- chronicity, and thus its underlying psychic mechanisms, will inevitably affect the hard sciences and the soft sciences (e.g., human sciences). The connection with the perception of reality will significantly change the dogmas of cognitive sciences. One single page may have been enough for us to start doubting the ET clichés widely spread by the movie industry. How can causality be variable when we still see the stars in the sky above us? I would like to discuss a recent article presented in La Recherche, also in the edition about time. Does cosmic time exist?, Marc Lachiéze-Rey asked. He presented the problem as follows. “What defines the properties of time?” The answer to this and many other questions means replacing current physics by another larger frame- work and using new concepts. Relativistic cosmology strictly applies the concept of space-time proposed by Einstein. However, what is the time of the relativistic ST? It is impossible to determine the duration of 1 re rs . toe 7 tome a a phenomenon in absolute terms, or to speak of simultaneity. This does not promote the idea of cosmic time, which would consist of using one and the same reference: the origin of the universe. This situation also contributes to the erosion of the Big Bang theory. Everyone can define their own time that will be different from all the other observers depending on its motion (position, velocity and acceleration). The time specific to an individual or object is therefore the only “physical” one. Of course, those who are close to one another, 144 The Science of Extraterrestrials: UFOs Explained at Last * Eric Julien