Page 145 of 400
compulsory due to the imperfection or simplicity of the system. Iam defending the idea that the simultaneous unfolding of the three dimen- sions of space is the source of causality and creation, and does not allow any retroaction in the past, because the degrees of freedom in space (and the space between chronons) are simply too large. On the other hand, in a simpler system with two spatial dimensions, these retroactions are possible under certain conditions. Klein reminded us that in classical physics, the principle of causal- ity is expressed simply by the fact that time is presumed linear with a well-defined course. In special relativity, it is guaranteed by the impos- sibility to transmit energy or information at a higher velocity than light speed. In the quantum field theory, the constraints of causality are expressed by the “commutation rules” of field operators. These com- mutation rules, he said, prevent particles from moving faster than light speed in the vacuum on the one hand and ensure that the creation of particles precedes their annihilation, on the other. However, what defines propagation in a non-local universe, as generated, for instance, by the superposition of states? That is a painful question! These constraints (commutation rules) require the existence of par- ticles mathematically described as particles “catching up” with the course of time (see the Feynman diagrams). In other words, antimatter would be the “material” trace of the fact that time is presumed to move in a single direction. The drawback is that antimatter has an extremely short lifespan and exists in very low quantities only. The assumption of a single temporal direction and the constant “materiality” of anti- matter leaves us with many questions, because no one has ever proven experimentally that antimatter can exist for a long time. Antimatter seems to be only the signature of a fractal spatio-temporal boundary. Antimatter does not exist as such, but it is still produced every day. Is It is only one side of the space-time story that takes shape when we observe the oneness of microscopic structures. The quasi-encounter between matter and antimatter shows the enormous energy of higher temporal fractals. Antimatter engines cannot be compared to classical propulsion systems. In general, the assumption that UFOs use propul- sion means adhering to an obsolete, inertial vision. However, throwing fission bombs, and more even antimatter bombs, is like declaring a war to ETs. We will find out why. Let me fast-forward a bit. If the world-line of an object (notion of special relativity) is exceeded, we will go faster than the speed of light. On the other hand, if an electron crosses this world-line, it becomes a Eternity or motion? Causality put to the test 137 this not a contradiction?