Page Content (OCR)
subconsciously want to eliminate it from their equations. They try to find connections that avoid the variations. However, the Frenchman asked, are flow, sequences, duration and irreversibility uninfluenced by matter-form relations? As a matter of fact, time can be found in all physical equations, in one form or another. As Klein put it: “physics claims the unchangeable and the constant. However, in practice, it bumps into time.” When it comes to temporal flow, classical physics and special relativity offer different answers. Duration suggests a beginning and an end seducing cosmologists to hold on to the Big Bang theory. “Irreversibility seems to be the actual temporality of time rather than one of its traits.”” May I add that it is even the source of the most persistent tautology there is. Is time really irreversible? Does the past always precede the future? The continuity of time imposes itself upon our mind because its hia- tuses do not seem to exist. This allows us to establish dates and use dat- ing instruments. Parameter t seems only to have one adjustable dimension. This tells us that time has weak topology. It can be expressed in two ways, lines or circles. The latter method was aban- doned by physicists because it does not observe the principle of causal- ity, as the cause cannot come after its effect.’ They cannot cut the branch they are sitting on. We now understand that the utter flaw of science — the dogma of causality and therefore of equations — prevents it from clearly perceiving the nature of reality and of paranormal phenomena in particular. Pretending to reproduce such a so-called supernatural phenomenon (by deterministic causality) therefore boils down to pure and simple ignorance! In short, skeptics ask the rain to fall only into a glass. In our mind we make the universe logical in agreement with our own logic! That is the definition of anthropocentrism. Scientists thus adhered to the idea of an irremediable, well-structured sequence. Nev- ertheless, the principle of least action, used by Feynman for quantum electrodynamics, reveals deep holes: “we have lost the idea of causality, according to which the particle feels the force and moves under its influ- ence. Instead, the particle magnificently explores all the curves, all the possibilities, and decides which way to go by choosing the one where our presence is minimal.” So is the world a system or the unfolding of a story? On the one hand, the philosopher Parmenides argued that the reality of the world is one being (the Way of Truth): an unchanging, indestructible whole; on the other, the philosopher Heraclitus believed that change is real and stability illusory. For him everything is “in flux.” Does physics describe permanence or metamorphosis? Maybe it 112 The Science of Extraterrestrials: UFOs Explained at Last * Eric Julien