Page Content (OCR)
with us — but who are we? — in a specific place: the present. Convince yourself and draw a straight line (a notion of space) placing past, pres- ent and future on it. Almost everything we do is related back to a spa- tial representation in the name of unchangeable, sacrosanct causality. Even pedagogy needs to draw reality. Thus, the “design” of the uni- verse has become the “drawing” of the world by force of habit. Iam not surprised that we lost sight of the first and gave preference to the second. Logic and its principle of excluding a third possibility made us believe in a logical flow between cause and effect, without even con- sidering any other principles. Hence the idea that every flow has an upstream and a downstream (another notion of space). How do we get out of this space matrix? How do we get out of this clearly determinis- tic causality? Does free will, of which we are so proud, really exist? Can the scientific and philosophical issue of determinism and its opposite indeterminism be solved in a mutually non-exclusive way? Is the uni- verse governed by one or the other? Or must a third principle be included so that thesis and antithesis find their synthesis? I think so. We will see that 3D time is the secret ingredient in this symmetry. By arguing the absolute opposite of this multiplying logic of spaces, I think — and the facts will convince you — that only time dimensions can be multiplied. We have to build a new frame of refer- ence consisting of multiple floors, where space will actually have fewer dimensions instead of more. It is time that will be gaining relief. However, instead of turning STs into conceptual virtualities, we will make them come alive, capable of forcing nature to behave itself in a certain way. In other words, an ST is not a simple box or an ordinary container, but a fluid that we can mold like a potter shapes his clay on a potter’s wheel. The shape of this modeling clay will subsequently be multi-purpose (in fact omni-purpose). What is time? Roland Lehouc,™ astrophysicist in the astrophysics department of the Atomic Energy Authority CEA,” described it as follows: “Time could seem one-dimensional without it being so really, a little as we lose our sight of relief by closing an eye...For instance [note: if time was three-dimensional], energy would no longer be just a number, but a vec- tor indicating the temporal direction of movement....If two observers who are moving according to different temporal directions meet, they will inevitably separate to follow the irrespective temporal trajectory, incapable of staying together. From the point of view of an observer, the other one would appear and then disappear immediately” [note: as UFOs or ghosts do]. I should add for the sake of completeness that this 98 The Science of Extraterrestrials: UFOs Explained at Last ° Eric Julien