Page Content (OCR)
From the time of the Roman Law, any Law that was enacted that did not follow its stated purpose, was an unenforceable law. Again the question of Intent of mind is the determinative factor i ina legal venue. For instance, if 1 aan. Po ry coe a law is passed that prohibited importation of, for our example we can say hemp, and the stated intent was because all hemp leads to drug abuse and destroys good health. That then would be the stated intent of the law. To protect the good health of the public. If the reality instead were, to raise prices with the true intent to protect a monopoly that would financially protect a group of political friends, the stated intent of the law then would differ with the true intent of such a law. The law in fraud is no law. Any law such as s this would be e a4 1 a 14 1 ao4 1 unenforceable, and no penalty would arise against a party who violated such a law. The year that hemp was made illegal is the same year that nylon was invented. Was the prohibition law against hemp actually created to protect a monopoly power? All culture haves laws, though only some cultures have prisons. Our culture, being of the predatory type, has many prisons. We have a whole range of laws aimed to fill these prisons. With pious sounds our political leaders tell us how we must rustle up all of these naughty folk, and put them into prison. Their political ploy is based on the notion that they, the politicians, are doing us some good. As you may discern, once the population figures this out, the prison system is going, going, gone. The word for prisons is from their nature as Penal institutions. The word Penal comes again from the Latin word for pain. If this system that we have were a musical group, it could be known as guns and cages. Of course on the other hand, if it were a sausage, it could be advertised, as “All shit no filler.” Queeny and her Sheenies are the worst of all Masters. The members of the political and business community have a way of talking to one another when we are not around. As an example when they discuss how they might contribute to the greater good of the people; to one another they express what is the actual strategy for dealing with the mass of the ordinary people, that is somewhat different to their claims of goodness and protection of us. Their real strategy towards us is this: “Fuck em’, Fleece > 9” em’ and Eat Em’. 108