Page 24 of 376
laughter. [p. 20] In the topography of intellection, | should say that what we call knowledge is ignorance surrounded by Black rains--red rains--the fall of a thousand tons of butter. Jet-black snow--pink snow--blue hailstones--hailstones flavored like oranges. Punk and silk and charcoal. About one hundred years ago, if anyone was so credulous as to think that stones had ever fallen from the sky, he was reasoned with: In the first place there are no stones in the sky: Therefore no stones can fall from the sky. Or nothing more reasonable or scientific or logical than that could be said upon any subject. The only trouble is the universal trouble: that the major premise is not real, or is intermediate somewhere between realness and unrealness. In 1772, a committee, of whom Lavoisier was a member, was appointed by the French Academy, to investigate a report that a stone had fallen from the sky at Luce, France. Of all attempts at positiveness, in its aspect of isolation, | don't know of anything that has been fought harder for than the notion of this earth's unrelatedness. Lavoisier analyzed the stone of Luce. The exclusionists' explanation at that time was that stones do not fall from the sky: that