Tbird vs The Flying Saucers - Michael Topper-pages

Page 90 of 234

Page 90 of 234
Tbird vs The Flying Saucers - Michael Topper-pages

Page Content (OCR)

One saw this quite plainly in the course of the week's proceed— ings, when the subject of Mr. Bielek might be broached in private with one of the "interviewees"; as prisoners of the improbable and targets of skepticism themselves in the broader framework, they were obviously reluctant to dismiss the subject altogether...yet there were, equally as obviously, major reservations at the Quality Inn. It should therefore be confessed at this point that Mr. Bielek was precisely one of those (very few) speakers we had specifically come there to see. Along with Betty Andreasson Luca his was the scheduled presence which had most drawn us out of our L.A. sanctuary, when we'd scanned the printed roster and read for the first time the summary of his allegations and odd claims. Never having heard of him before, there was nonetheless something which in his presentation above all resonated an arcane chord of valid correspondence with AAA and MT; we had the instant intimation that here at last might be something we'd long been silently awaiting—regardless what would have to be traded in terms of security and otherwise given up, we'd have to move in response toward it to definitively "find out". We were, in fact, on a fishing expedition; and, as we suspected, there proved to be an Angler on the other end of the line as well, fishing for something very descriptively akin to us. Eye of Horns Under the same general question then of ,,Validation", it might here be asked how the Southern Crown adepts themselves establish what they consider to be reliable—enough identification of some truth to—for instance—move them out on a journey they'd otherwise not be tempted to make. The question has largely been answered already (see for example issue 8, April 1990 of the TNTC, "How To Stuff A Wild Blue Meanie"); it admittedly hinges on appeal to what in this culture is a "special case", i.e initiated understanding—the Intuitive basis of 42 which is clearly distinguished from both scientific and superstitious definitions in describing itself as the minimum threshold degree in the intensification and alignment of the mind—body whole with respect to awakened values of Unitive Spirit—consciousness, such that any subject, held steadily at the inner eye, is disclosed in Light of the actual Wholeness from which it takes its Being (and therefore in which it models, gyroscopically, its measure of real truth). This is an understandably difficult "source" of verification or Identity to comprehend, from the viewpoint of a knowledge that only knows how to form its units of interrogation from conditional patterns polarized through Whole-Being value but not directly aligned with Whole—Being value. This is a primary type of direct (unmediated) Knowing with which the culture at large is certainly unfamiliar, and not yet ready—by a great, mean measure—to adopt on any noticeable scale. And yet it does not stand, correctly comprehended, as another absolute and untestable appeal to "special authority" as with the standard "keepers of the sacred keys" whose initiated knowing can't be duplicated in the mass; for one thing, those sufficiently prepared and willing to endure can receive the requisite Life—current of such initiated knowledge themselves, whereby the dormant organs and hidden faculties needed to participate in such Opening are quickened, developed and integrated as conscious adjuncts. Nor in any case is it expected that those things cited and described through faculty of Intuitive illumination by its designated adepts be taken for granted even by those unable to match such magnification of the "inner viewfinder"; rather, those altogether—admirable faculties of inductive reason and deductive conclusion, those resources of per— ception, 90 T-Bird_Vs_The_Flying_saucers.htm eyes of the larger public whom they would—of course—be trying to affect.