Tbird vs The Flying Saucers - Michael Topper-pages

Page 85 of 234

Page 85 of 234
Tbird vs The Flying Saucers - Michael Topper-pages

Page Content (OCR)

pseudo—infonnation comprising the subliminal network of reliances and psychic assurances programmed to respond in identification of the "acceptable" highlights, and to disregard the anomalies flickering between—like the command of the Wizard exposed behind his manipulative facade in Oz. The back of the brain would simply recline, feet up on the frontal lobe in the confidence that "somebody" in authority was always hall—monitor so that nothing could ultimately get by the public guard, "someone" whose personal interests always coincided happily with the well—being and benefit of the whole if through no other mechanism than that of laissez—faire (i.e. the politically elected, or the anointed secular "priesthood" as exemplified in the vigilant sobriety of Cardinal Sagan) would always loom over the production—line of world events as guarantor of quality control, keeping each—selective—feature carefully adjusted to the acceptable framework. Thus "we" might not know what science has to say about the possibility of something or another gaining the admittance of verifiable truth into the world, but there was certainly someone who did—all such parties being ultimately immune to economic, political or psychological influence though they be Lord—high potentates of just such domains. Indeed there was some baffling, magic balancing device in the culturally—absorbed dogma of "pluralism" that ensured all special interests and self-serving factors cancelled in the end, sifting out a stable worldorder as continuous byproduct. If documentation of the "acceptable" type was the thing conventionally demanded, why wasn't documentation of the perfectly—acceptable and eminently available type ever sought out? As a simple matter of book-keeping, the information behind the empty content was generally accessible in rough and ready form—with a little detour perhaps to properly educate oneself in the interesting history of banking and international finance, there was the wholly subversive documentation of the Congressional Record to draw on (nothing arcane or debatable here, just the official periodical reporting all regular proceedings of all daily political processes and incidentally depositing the most brazen of nonchalant facts regarding the workaday behaviors of lobbies and de facto interests, translated as the policy output of steering committees representing the electorate by way of multinational conglomerates and big—money empires...) In order for the eventual Editors to be able to edit, there had to be an initial amorphous massing of related information—and the compiling of information is always a stenographic matter. The information, to state the self-evident, had to exist before it could disappear, and enough trace—evidences of such a fact survive to make any given field visible to reconstituted information once again— if the minimum effort follows along behind the wisdom that comes to appreciate this principle. Thus evidence of basic engineering in the field of "pure science" can be reclaimed out of obscurity any time, in turning toward the dedicated work of those who've already done much to rescue the censured formulae and diagrammatic dreams of Lights the likes of Reich and Rife, Tesla and T. Townsend Brown...J/nformation still exists, and may be found, where doctored content stands in official representation of the Warren Commission conclusions—information of a mutually reinforcing character and consistent testimony at diametric odds with the selective residue packaged as single-volume summary (simply consult the unedited volumes, or meet the same evidences in a larger context of research as exemplified in such recent—best—selling—works as High Treason, by Robert J. Groden and Harrison Edward Livingstone). At another level it was just as obvious that those most vociferous re "scientific verification", proof, documentation et al. weren't really interested in something secured by approved criteria per se; their lofty standards were a psychological pose rather than an authentic guideline, since time—and—again proofs 85 T-Bird_Vs_The_Flying_saucers.htm Congress Con Demonium