Page Content (OCR)
11 Just a little reflection, however, should wobble any such presumption; for no 3rd density scientist (for example) seems automatically constrained to "good works" by his own evidence that the elements operate through a mutually defining network of closely integrated properties and unitive principles. The objection to this, of course, is that the comparative perceptual "samadhi" of a 4th density magnitude would tend to subvert the dualistic underpinnings of the psychological structure—characteristic of 3rd density—that permits a persistent behavioral conformance to its divisive claims while allowing free rational admission of an tas ‘ on: However, self—recoiled ego—identification is at bottom a conscious preference rather than a provisional mechanical constraint, and this is proven precisely in the higher densities where there is no longer a polarized lock—in enforcing a linear and abstractly distancing—or thetically "dividing"—left brain emphasis; at these accelerated levels, the adherence to divisive egoism in the face of the unitive Void-field is a manifest expression of will, and can only be the resort of a very conscious intent (i.e. it can no longer be "excused" as the subconscious habit—pattern of the enculturated nervous system). The clear decision to lurk and prey behind the overt holism and ecstatic oneness of reality, using that spiritual love—continuity in fact as a camouflage through which to install oneself by stealth, becomes self—evidently the option of a conscious being only (for the beings of 3rd density, no matter how "negative" they may be behaviorally, are not conscious— as 3rd stage beings—of the unitive holism of Void—nature and so do not have that value as an option to include in their calculations). This accounts, for example, for the confusion Strieber feels in confrontation with his tormenting entities; as merciless as they are toward him, he feels the presence of /ove rather strongly when around them. This in conjunction with the compensatory mechanisms of psychological fear—reaction help lead him to conclude that they must be at bottom or in some way "good", and have mankind's welfare at heart. What Strieber/ee/.s in their presence is the informing quality of the density through which they characteristically function, i.e. the Love-density of the 4th stage. However, he fails to realize the manner in which this Love—unity—feeling is the pervasive property of that density (to which he is temporarily exposed in his abduction), not the personal expression of the beings—except insofar as they consciously invert the love—value of that density upon the shadowy, nucleated outlines of their intentionally preserved, egoic brand of selfhood. However, the beings rely on the general Love—feeling of that density to confuse the issue, to befool the bedeviled mind into taking psychological refuge in a self—protective premise that will further encourage the acceptance of their most coercive behaviors as reverse—twist exemplifications of the general rule of "love". Why then do even otherwise "good" sources in the general category of channeled material sometimes speak to the effect that nothing negative can move on to the higher planes or stages of development? First of all, of course, the character of the channeler himself has to be taken into account along with all his preconditioning and personal limitation. The channeled source often transcends those limits, if it is a good and strongly aligned source; but it may also make use of those limits. In the case for example of the Bird—tribe source which Ken Carey channeled, we find illustration of a certain benign "contention" or division in methodology belonging to the higher 4th—density plane; for it should be understood that 4th density sources (of which Carey's is one) function through a variety of concepts as to which "approach" would be most practical and productive in raising 3rd—density consciousness. There is no absolute agreement in the 4th density even amongst positive groups of intelligent service. Carey's source is simply demonstrating, in its explanations, the decision to 29 T-Bird_Vs_The_Flying_saucers.htm Sticking to Your Guns underlying unity of Being. What You Don't Know...