Page Content (OCR)
conditions." "So the fact that the given 'spiritual teacher' of the positive type has more or less the whole of the positive hierarchy behind him, in the technical sense of magically intensifying the coordinate alignments of those patterns through which he functions, is nonetheless not the equivalent of a real compensation for the typical inertia and resistance accorded that teaching—presence through the 'volitional' orientation indicative of the roa a “oem "I think it's fair to say that. The incarnate teacher has only one fundamental purpose, and that is to transform consciousness, to awaken consciousness. No trick in the book, so to speak, that can be brought to bear towards technical furtherance of that aim as a teaching device or demonstration, can ever be considered the equivalent of affecting any such change. The free—will variable at the heart of this consciousness—transformation reserves the inalienable right of its bullheaded blindness to call a Heart a Club, and to insist that Everest is an anthill if you but back far enough away from it. In other words, magnitude of sheer magical effect within the conventionally 'permissible' context of the blindered dimension in question, is no guarantor of a capitulation or ceding from the indigenous psychic stance; since the free—will variable — functioning from the premise of its locally—distortive framework — can and does exercise the volitional 'right' to dismiss the evidence of asubtle syllogism as well as the public disappearance of Mount Rushmore, that irreducible prerogative is the absolute leveler. There's no degrees of relative efficacy obtaining (as in some mechanical or alegbraic formula) between the intensity of 'persuasion' exerted by the Nonordinary patterning of circumstances through the Teaching—presence, and the independent determinant of will — no matter how conditioned by distortion of the ego—subject toward whom the teaching demonstration is directed. There's just no such equation at all; and yet they do bear a relation to one another. "The teaching demonstration, and the Presence of the teacher altogether, is given on behalf ol the free—will variable. So they bear an indeterminate relation to one another. In other words, it's a relation which, while its effects and interactions can be estimated by a process similar to statistical averaging, can't be determined beforehand in any absolute way. This is why the true spiritual teacher on the positive side of the density—divide has much the more difficult task, in this sense, than his negative counterpart; for the positively—aligned teacher isn't just attempting to influence or induce a behavioral modification; he's trying to effect the infinitely more subtle, elusive and difficult work of awakening consciousnessi.e. persuading its volitional fulcrum on the basis of its own innate merit beyond all the conditioning that would counsel otherwise, and keep its determinations statistically locked-in’. The negative 'teacher’, on the other hand, while certainly attempting to affect a polarization of consciousness in alignment with the negative higher—density orientation, is precisely most effective in his work by the indirect or surreptitious method of behavioral modification, i.e. causing that polarization—preference of probationary consciousness to take place imperceptibly as silent effect of the sum direction emerging from its cumulative behaviors. Thus the negative 'teacher' slyly induces reactive behaviors, intensifying the most negative lines of tendency through aggravating indigenous fears >and magnifying them into preemptive determinants; the subject—candidate tonegative polarization finds himself well on the way to total negative—interpretation of existence (through the tacit, collective thrust of implemented behaviors) before consciousness need pivot on its volitional fulcrum and assume such ‘philosophy’ as an overriding Intent, a direct desidcration of its own. "In this sense, the negative 'graduate' just ratifies what has been implicitly accepted already; he puts his ‘conscious’ stamp on a 'fait accompli" that has effectively characterized his orientation for some time. "You can see it, for example, when the higher—density negative 'alien' presences encourage the paranoid and bellicose tendency of the military mentality to the degree that it's pressured to enact all its logical conclusions, 212 T-Bird_Vs_The_Flying_saucers.htm a stable reference ofldentity precisely in the midst of what could otherwise be bewilderingly changing opaque Earth—medium itself."