Page Content (OCR)
"For one thing," MT then resumed the explanation, "it would have to be a 'Will' which retained the spirit or abstract character defining the value of will in the first place, in order to continue to qualify as a technical expression of Will; but it would have to enforce that abstract character, in this case, over—against the deep gyroscopic specificity of emotion descriptive of the whole—psychic engagement of the creative field (i.e. as an expression of the Love—value obtaining between Consciousness and Its Logos). It would have to suppress or consciously sacrifice the intrinsic Love—value of being with its instrumental feelings and emotions, thereby excising the very term by which the Whole—value of Will could be realized and implemented as a functional Mean of the creative field. "Having got rid of the only viable mode by which that Whole—value of Will could be translated in and through the keys of the creative field, having eliminated the one vital and organic means meant to transform Will into real behaviors and productive venues, all that's left is the stark relation between Will and those patterns (replete with all the persisting, importunate pressures and demands) but bereft of the mediating organ, the empathetic agent of the Heart." "But of course; where there is no longer the innate, spontaneous response—pattern of the heart, where love and the feeling/emotional nature become suppressed or distorted from their immediate reflex as unerring functions of Will, we have the beginnings of that preemptive if parasitic presence of the pseudo—will, the impositional and authoritarian ‘will’ of the Anti-logos. Wherever feelings and innate emotional response—patterns are thwarted, blamed, crippled with the doubt of guilt, there the false—will of the Luciferian overlord gains firm foothold and usurps the real functions of the creative pattern; there the simulated enforcements of the pseudo—Will assertthe primacy of Procrustean abstraction, the parental guilt—-conscience of dry categories, inorganic rules and inflexible doctrine, restrictive ideals and thetic, socially—sanctioned goals...there creativity is crushed, and sold piecemeal to the mere technique of 'approved' forms without any difference being noticed awe at all." "Yes; the function of 'concept', perfectly legitimate in itself, is like everything else co—opted to the service of that arid spirit. Then such concepts aren't even the 'end—all/be—all' that they seem; they're merely expedient means to the ultimate end of killing out all life, all spontaneity, variability or organic elasticity altogether thus rendering everything suitably—predictable and behavioralty programmable to the smallest detail without deviation. When you can run whole-societies on knee-jerk concepts and categorial — or distorted — emotions such as 'nationalism' or 'one—worldism' commanding total, irrational allegiance, you can engineer what otherwise would be the unthinkable — you can get consciousness to accept anything, to tolerate or even to apparently require any predetermined thing at all 0533 even if that 'thing' is provably inimical to the well—being of the individual, the individual's offspring, the society — even life altogether. And there's the key. Unbelievably enough, you can easily induce consciousness to accept or even crave what is essentially and demonstrably anti-—life." "Indeed." 204 T-Bird_Vs_The_Flying_saucers.htm "Aha; I begin to see where this is leading us..." "I see — 'will' becomes something which is...aridly mental — the expression of a preemptive conceptualizing." "Well; I guess that sums up the Luciferian project, if anything does."