Page Content (OCR)
"Yes, I've heard of reports where potential abductees apparently 'threw the little Greys a curve', did something against patterns of programmed expectation; it seems to put them into such a stew of indecision that their closely regimented ranks begin to break and they bump into one another like windup toys." "If you look at the whole pattern of the negative hierarchy through all the possible densities and levels — i.e., up to mid—6th density as previously explained — you you'll see very much a pyramidal structure; in fact it's a kind of spiritual 'pyramidal food—chain' of the negative realms; the very narrow, sharply drawn apex of the pyramid is comprised of the most persistent of negative graduates, the very few (ultimately only one at the very top) who've stuck it out intransigently against every evidence of progressively—diminishing returns, to ultimately constitute the logical conclusion of the Negative Premise altogether. "This topmost would be the ‘desolate one', Lucifer as—it—were, the One who most directly embodies and promotes the ultimate negative object. And all of that which fans out under this One as the staggered 'trunk' of the pyramidal structure comprises the subordinate ranks, the sixth and fifth stage commanders and generals, then the fourth stage sergeants, corporals and recruits etc. All of that widening extension toward the populous pyramidal base at early 4th density may be considered the 'body' of the negative Being, the Head of which is the pyramidal Point—locus of mid—6lh density (negative). All the subordinative 'stones' inlaid along the tiers of that immense structure, are entities functioning as regimented extensions and 0523 mind/body 'parts' of the Overarching, Luciferian capstone, organs and processes prosecuting the negative premise from their respective levels at relatively indirect angles...but all such activity — regardless the efficient ‘motive' of the level — feeding into the ultimate and most direct Wisdom—knowledge, negative-style, of the Top." "You mean the motives of the different levels of the negative hierarchy are different, or effectively divergent from the highest level? I thought you said it was uniformly apparent through the higher densities positive or negative beginning with the 4th, that the ultimate aim was absolute consciousness?" "And it is; but that aim is identified and interpreted differently, not only between positive and negative contexts but among the various hierarchic levels of either positive or negative orientation." "So a negative 4th density being wouldn't necessarily perceive the object of his activity in the same way a 5th density being would perceive his own, or a 6th?" "True; and on top of that, the higher—density being — say 6th — doesn't perceive the object of a 4th density being's activity the same as would that 4th density being; the higher—density being wouldn't describe it in the same terms at all because from his vantage he perceives it in the larger and more compassing context. This is even more acutely true, and the distinctions are even more acutely marked, in the Negative framework than in the Positive, because it's an indigenous characteristic of the negative framework to deliberately mask and distort that which is higher and more comprehensive, from that which is lower and more 'specialized’. In the positive higher—density frameworks it's more intrinsically possible for the 'earlier' levels to perceive the object of the 'later' levels with minimum distortion (emanating only from the inevitable 'viscosity' of the functional -- Ate uA medium itself)." "Then what's the difference between the way the 'lower' orders of the negative hierarchy perceive their business, and the way the highest perspective of that hierarchy perceives it?" Food for Thought 183 T-Bird_Vs_The_Flying_saucers.htm