Page 160 of 234
dislocation of surface "wander" relative to the spin axis ("caused" by satellite impact) would have had its momentum influenced by many more intervening, topographic anomalies than would allow for the implicit adjustment between the tendency of the magnetic field to be dragged and carried by the rotational drift, and to recover its spin—axial alignment. The field would have degraded, and the surface migration would have settled out through the myriad minor perturbations to which it was mechanically subject in the absence of convection—maintenance of the bulge. If the satellite pockmarks on the surface are the result and not the cause of such shifts, what caused the shifts? And why were the satellites drawn in as a result? The obvious answer (since we've set up a syllogism) is that a change in the actual intensity of the lunar gravitational field caused the surface drift, and therefore at the same time pulled down satellites orbiting sufficiently close; any such change in gravitational intensity in this context, is an engineered change. The simple differential between the gravitic values of the field—loop or annular "plate" generating the amplified current, and the floating cover of the lithosphere, accounts for the relative displacement of movement between the two—the impacts could account for the specific direction of the lithosphere drift, and maintenance of the magnetic/gravitational field would normalize the flow of its topographic repositioning so as to ensure its "settling" into optimum mass distribution. The generation of varying intensities of the lunar gravitational field over time, of course, if deliberately engineered brings the inevitable question Why? If varying gravitic effects on the Earth have profound influence on the electrochemical and biomagnetic balance of the processes that take place there, the answer of "species engineering, regulation and development" is sufficient. If we ask Who? we may answer Whoever is interested, and for whatever purposes— and, whoever wins out in the bid for controlling the "gravitic" mechanisms that are installed there as the lunar raison d'etre. Thus we may take a good second look at the reported "ac— tivities" taking place surreptitiously on the moon, the apparent mining, the alien and military encampments etc. Is there an overwhelmingly important factor involved in all this, one inconceivable to conventional standards but which would be well within the range of apprehension of the secret government, esoteric organizations and alien civilizations of the higher—density type? For whoever may have originally installed the artificial gravity—regulator of the Moon, it may well have changed hands several times, and may indeed be in the process of some such similar change, orderly or contested, once again. Let's return to the anomaly of the Earth—lunar neutral point. If the readjusted neutral point suggests a lunar gravitation comparable to Earth, what prevents the Moon from dropping in for dinner? The answer has to do with the real character of gravitational "attraction". As we know from Einstein, gravity is the geometric curvature of spacetime. All mass and energy tends to flow in conformance with the strongest curvature. Esoteric science understands the mechanism of this influence in field—energy terms. The production of spacetime curvature through the standard equations of mass—ener— gy—acceleration induces a pressure gradient in the "scalar" vacuum. The zero—point energy of the vacuum actually presses uniformly from all sides of a global gravity—mass; the virtual-state energy of that vacuum, while it induces a real pressure, does not have to be additionally calculated in the sum of interstellar energies, solar winds and plasmas producing interference patterns and shockwaves etc.; for that vacuum energy is the equivalent of gravity itself. When two celestial bodies are drawn toward one another along the pressure—gradients of their respective curvatures, the masses tend to block the pressure—flow impinging on their facing surfaces; this reduction of 160 T-Bird_Vs_The_Flying_saucers.htm Uh, Come Again, Fuhrer? And what would be the secret factor most coveted, most desired by any power understanding the real character of our "silvery companion"?