Page Content (OCR)
neutral point between Earth and moon, leaves us—for example— with the purely mathematical assumption that lunar gravity should be much greater than that predicted from Newtonian calculations (and still conventionally recited by NASA). Indeed some initial publicity seems to have been given to the fact that the Moon supports a thin atmosphere as well as a type of vegetative growth. Fred Steckling refers to the February 1972 issue of National Geographic in which a confirmation exists of the October 29,1969 Time magazine article reporting the detectable presence of a lunar magnetic field, as well as a thin atmosphere; the same National Geographic article referred to Apollo 12 and Apollo 14 reports of lunar quakes and water vapors, as well as the Apollo 15 reports of active volcanic cones emitting gassesin the Littrowcrater. Colored photos indicative of vegetation were reproduced in that issue tending to confirm the Washington Daily News articles of 1968 reporting findings of Earth—like soil demonstrably supportive of wheat, tomatoes and limes etc. The existence of viable soil, a magnetic field and atmosphere implies a greater gravitational component than is conven- tionally conceded—so much greater, however, according to Professor Brian's rectified neutral—point calculations, that the lunar gravitation ought to be comparable to that of Earth! Which leads us to the inevitable question as to why the Moon isn't presently sitting in our collective lap. One can't arbitrarily throw out one scientifically—logical component simply in order to preserve the other; though it is not an often confessed truth, the Moon indeed has soil, water vapor, atmosphere and active quakes; its neutral point is 23,000 miles off the Newtonian calculations, and the implications of that fact are that the Moon ought to be gravitically within range of Earth—gravity. At the same time, that scientifically—incontrovertible fact "scientifically" places the Moon by amplified gravitational attraction, in 1 our lap. The answer emanating from initiated understanding supports those occasional speculations that the Moon is in fact an artificial satellite. The ordinary obstructions to understanding how this may possibly be, however, need no longer seem so insurmountable. Lifting our perspective from the "local" limitations of 3rd density Earth—consciousness (in which even the subtlest forms of subatomic engineering—at least at the consensually "known" level—are still, at bottom, technological extensions of the fixed sensory—motor faculties rather than the fibrous currents of the energy—centers) we may conceive how highly unified waves of consciousness belonging to more deeply integral densities move to energize informing geometries of space, precipitating planning—board streams of convergent and collecting elements prefiguring "spatial regions"; through strongly organized impulses of psychic induction (augmented—or not—by magnetically amplifying apparatus, depending on degree of 156 T-Bird_Vs_The_Flying_saucers.htm