Page Content (OCR)
The existence of "future" points along that timeline to which they have unobstructed access, is misleading. For all such "futures" pertain to the types of development that are enclosed by, and belong to, the strata of densities composing the cross-section of that "horizontal axis". The "future" changes that appear anywhere along that line, belong strictly to entities involved "at the time" with factors characterizing the limits of those densities. To any of these points the spacedorks have access, because they're masters of those densities included in the horizontal laminae of planes and states. Their equipotential relation to time on the horizontal level, however, doesn't take into account the Axis of vertical "temporality" or developmental change in which they are participating, and in which they therefore have an evolving role. PART Il Since any thesis advanced by Initiated Understanding is (understandably) not going to be directly verifiable for most, for a very long time, it should be expected of any such thesis that it serve better than alternate ideas to account for the pertinent evidences; it is reasonable to expect any proposition basing its case on the special resort of higher authority, like parallel kinds of claims issuing from official "priesthoods" and exclusivist sources accepted every day on their initialed expertise alone without further question as to the validity of that expertise (i.e. the authorities of science and medicine etc.), to be able to discern the inconsistencies or inadequacies of every current answer and prove able as well to reasonably resolve such gaps from the ingredients of its own gris—gris bag. Thus if we turn to a given datum of the Andreasson case used in support of current theses or speculative surmises, we need ask first whether the notion bears up under internal logic of its own elements (implicitly feeling, of course, that it's bad form to impose any "exterior", ready—made order of logic—since it's precisely the presentation of a whole alternative universe, containing the prospect of some different class of cognition altogether with its own internal congeries of "rules" that such odd incidents promise in the first place, and which accounts for their curious attraction—why then deprive them of the very potential that stands to make them unique, by weighing them on conventional scales?) If the given notion, purporting to present some true proposition toward the case in question, collapses on its own internal evidence, we must turn to initiated understanding next to see whether if may not have some higher-order means of smoothly fitting the colliding edges of all—relevant—pieces. If, by these fair criteria, we but glance at the explanation advanced by the Dorks themselves as to the reason for (and purpose of) their Earth-womb borrowing, we find immediately that the "explanation" collapses by internal evidence, along with all the conjectural hypotheses of the investigators using such rationale as mortar for their own scale models. The dorks insist that "temporarily borrowing" the wombs of abductees is just an expedient, a means of circumventing the plight that's befallen their own species as a result of its genetic deviation; it seems the 149 T-Bird_Vs_The_Flying_saucers.htm The Dream Engineers You Should Never Tell a Lady You Can Opulate, Boys