Page Content (OCR)
When Luna 2 finally hit the surface and Luna 3 circled the far side, Russian efforts suddenly and mysteriously stopped for four years. Similarly, the U.S. withdrew for a period of two years after '63, obviously to recalibrate their operative values. The revised estimates of the lunar "neutral point" based on experience, placed it at 43,495 miles from lunar center, about 23,000 miles off from the pre—Apollo calculations. The 1/6th gravitational value NASA continues to claim for the moon is grossly inconsistent with the value of the neutral point derived from experiment. The actual gravity of the moon according to the operative data, is very comparable to Earth's. Corroboratively, Apollo flight times are significantly more rapid than is consistent with the 1/6—gravity dogma. Why the obvious refusal to change the data on gravity ratios? The implication of a high-gravity moon as must actually exist, yields conventional fuel requirements for landing and acceleration that would have made the '69 Lunar Module of 33,200 Ib.—weight a 330,000 Ib. vehicle! The famous moonwalk everyone knows so much about in the conventional certitude of their "factual", documented world, wasn't achieved with rockets. The /aunch rocket was authentic enough, but from there a secret source had to have taken over for the feat to have been accomplished. Significant to our viewpoint re U.S.—alien treaty etc., it was the U.S. that successfully demonstrated a manned lunar landing, despite early Russian space achievements. What accounts for the Russians having mysteriously pulled out of the competition? The probability in this framework, is that justification of the NASA spaceprogram (and therefore its funding, its continued distractive presence etc.) had finally to be buttressed by help from the secret side of acquired U.S. technology which, seven years earlier, had actually placed joint U.S.—Russian teams on Mars. This accounts for Russia's quiet withdrawal and acquiescence in the early '60s. "Conventional" technology, in order to successfully perform according to the real if often quiet recalculations of practical coordinates (incorporating the anomalies of what is—for instance—most probably an artificial moon) necessarily has to maintain the show by covert installation of alien—derived instruments, antigravity and timeshift devices etc.—thus supporting what Al Bielek was to tell MT about the routine if little known use of exotic technologies in "conventional" craft that, chronologically, we're not even supposed to be close to. (Ever wonder why the astronauts never bounced around on the surface of the moon like Superball, as predicted under conditions of 1/6th gravity?) The "giant leap for mankind" was not undertaken on behalf of mankind, and wasn't a "giant leap"; it was the first small step of "conventional reality" in assaying the hubris of its paper calculations, an Icarus of historical asumption that fell immediately off a fatal curve—a gauche move of flying pinfeathers that, if not rapidly covered over and minimized with nonchalant silence (propped behind the scenes with the closed—club technologies actually corresponding to the world just dropped into) would throw all carefully preserved conventions of mass orientation assuring a safe orderly universe under complete control of the government/scientific realitycaretakers, into unrecoverable chaos. Why, for example, is lunar soil at least a billion years older than lunar rocks? Why are over 99% of the moon's rocks, returned to earth for analysis, older that 90% of the oldest of known earth rocks? Why, according to NASA, did the moon actually "ring like a gong or bell" with reverberations echoing from one to four hours, after third stage rockets and ascent stages of lunar modules crashed to its hard surface? Why did iron samples brought back by Soviet and American probes prove to be rustproof, an "impossible" state virtually unknown to earth science except for a pillar of solid iron in New Delhi, indeterminantly old, which also inexplicably doesn't rust! How could enormous clouds of water vapor (over 100 square miles) suddenly appear on the "dry" lunar surface after missions as late as Apollo 15—especially when, given NASA's 1/6 gravity—convention, the moon shouldn't be capable of atmosphere retention and thus of having any clouds whatsoever! (More on gravity anomalies in Ch. IV.) 125 T-Bird_Vs_The_Flying_saucers.htm