Page Content (OCR)
When we of the 7—Bird put such things forward for consideration of the readership, then, it is done first of all on the basis of initialed understanding, and nothing set forward is not confirmed in that way; nothing is presented on the basis of speculation and secondary evidences, though speculations and secondary evidences are, as we've seen, often introduced in order to draw a clear parallel between what is known by wisdom of the interior Eye and what is concomitant\y gathered by investigators working from the inductive framework. Therefore what's stated here as truth first comes from the initiated eye; the specific accumulation of "facts" or items presented as fads which we draw in as collaborative or contrastive data from secondary research sources (i.e. the Cooper material, A/ternative III etc.) has—beyond its possible general congruence with that insight— to be further authenticated or canceled by piecemeal physical research just as in the case of anyone else. In the same way, when writing about "physics" (as is done in this issue under the MT habit of Mother Terasu) the character, condition and reality of the energy—domains discussed are first of all drawn from direct cognition through the wisdom Eye—they are seen, as you would view a sky of nightstars— and only afterward, in order to communicate in and help accelerate the "current" acceptable language of physics, must it be determined what of this directly—perceived Whole the physicist puts together piecemeal and understands from his vantage; to do this, the adept must hit the books and study as anyone, only not with the eye of acquiring primary knowledge but rather for the sake of absorbing the physicist's viewpoint to be able to communicate with him—or, through the initial common denominator of that language, beyond 58 So it is that, for example, we may still cite (he. Alternative HI source—text of Leslie Watkins, David Ambrose and Christopher Miles, confirming that the general information is valid by initiated insight while reminding that the original English t.v. presentation was a "docudrama", and therefore doesn't qualify as primary evidence— a fact obscured by the book—version which gives the dramatized events on the contrary as straightforward reportage rather than imaginative recreation. That the British team did in fact perform true and sedulous research, that the theme and its particulars aren't wholecloth product of their vivid invention, is substantiated by numerous other sources; indeed authentic sources, documents, interview contents and information are presented straightforwardly in both book and t.v. show quite admixed with the dramatized portions. It is not generally known, owing basically to the presentation of the bookform and the hard-to-get video, that for example the interview with astronaut "Bob Grodin" in Alternative HI is a compound made of tapes, interviews and bits of classified film dramatizing the words of several NASA astronauts; the fact that hard—pavement research is in evidence in this presentation, may be seen in the very classified character of the space agency sources from which the dramatized data was drawn— "Grodin's" allegations in the docudrama for example are actually versions of exclamatory statements by Neil Armstrong and his crew—blanked out of broadcasts—when, in their televised moon landing of July 20, '69 they were unavoidably ex— posed to the offcamera spectacle of a spacecraft encampment, having fatefully overshot their projected landing site— a circumstance that was indeed captured by some ham operators at the time, and persistently circulated ever since. Similarly, the reality of the "batch consignment" program exists in independent evidences, but of much later origin for the most part (especially in hypnotically recovered memories of abductees) so that the probability of 122 T-Bird_Vs_The_Flying_saucers.htm of increasingly critical consequence can be made on the basis of input not automatically given for the necessary computations. him—thus to help enlarge the general context toward higher stages of integral development. Crop Sacrifice of the Man—in—Motley: April Fool