Page 159 of 298
warfare among the opposing groups, those who believe in the New Age way of thinking and those who believe in the Bible. For there is no intent to foster strife and dissension. There is simply an intent to gradually awaken. All knowledge could be dumped at once, but this would serve no helpful purpose. So the informa- tion must be given gradually, so that enlightenment takes place. : [know there willbe peoplewho willobject. But itjustoccuredto me that your version might have some relationto the Biblical legend It is, as such, a legend, and is not understood in very accurate terms as to what it related to in fact Itis a very interesting story. But we have already indicated that it is based tenuously on mere shreds offact. There are only very loosely-based impressions Loan Le wanted D: Would you want to expandon that? P: Not at this time for as we have said, we are not in consensus, and of expertise. And so represent a balanced makeup of the differ- ent areas of knowledge, both in dealing with the human experi- ence and from the higher realms of existence. This is a council which is made up of those who can accurately represent these many different varied interests. So when all is consensus none is a loser, all are winners. Had there been dissension there would be one aspect of the council who could be considered losers, for their point of view was not accurately represented or considered. Then it's still hardto get 12 people to agree even on that side. There is much more willingness to agree here. There is ‘not stub- bornness such as is common on your planet. There is merely differing viewpoints. So these different viewpoints would require that a presentation be arrived at that would result i in aconsensus. lo re i -- weaoa 1 15? The Keepers of the Garden on this planet. We wish not to create dissension or strife and which can be correlated. we must be in consensus before we can channel. That is part of ee ede ee et ee ed our mandate. For there are 12 of us and each has his own area There could arise situations in which there is no consensus, and so this subject would be dropped totally.