Page Content (OCR)
Chapter Two We understand that human thinking can penetrate only to a given limit at a given time. What we fail to understand is why the human intellect does not stop at this point and say: “this is the present limit of my understanding. Let us wait until new vistas open up”. This would be rational, comprehensible, purposeful thinking. [Ether, God and Devil, Wilhelm Reich] available! There are many vistas of understanding that are open in our world to those with eyes to see! We have listed our sources, there are photographs and images of the proof that our planet has been repeatedly bombarded with showers of comets/asteroids; there exists stacks of evidence - recorded in books, papers, monographs, theories - that civilizations of greater advancement than our own have existed on the earth, and have been repeatedly destroyed. There are piles of evidence that attest to a far greater age of mankind than is presently accepted or taught by mainstream science. And in every case, this evidence is ignored, marginalized, explained or argued away, and those who wish to make such information public to a wider audience, are similarly marginalized and dealt with. What is even more interesting, as we noted previously, is the fact that the “mainstream occultists” have jumped on the uniformitarian bandwagon and are vigorously promoting reams of disinformation. And our own experience has been that our attempts to talk about this sort of thing have resulted in coordinated attacks from certain so-called “occultists”, who have even sunk so low as to spend inordinate amounts of time roaming the internet, denouncing our research group as a “cult”, writing libelous, defamatory public postings about us personally, and most importantly: attempting to destroy the C’s material as a source of clues to our reality. Reich notes this problem and writes: inordinate the internet, as to amounts What amazes us is the sudden turn from the rational beginning to the irrational illusion. Irrationality and illusion are revealed by the intolerance and cruelty with which they are expressed. We observe that human thought systems show tolerance as long as they adhere to reality. The more the thought process is removed from reality, the more intolerance and cruelty are needed to guarantee its continued existence. [Ibid.] And here is where we have to begin to really think about things in a reasonable and objective way. If there is so much evidence available - and there is - why is it so rabidly attacked and dismissed? Why is it necessary to defame, libel, crush and destroy those who bring up these matters, and who also produce the evidence? Most especially, why is this so, when we know that there ARE groups - such as the government and certain academics - who DO study these things, who do commission reports on them, who do collect the data? Just what they who do 400 The only problem here is that we have discovered that the material is