Page Content (OCR)
course, Bush would be incapable of perceiving it in that context. Is it so that a message was intended in this event? Q: (L) In other words, everyone’s reaction to the event will depend on their own context. There is the view that it was a “message to Bush.” Bush and gang will, of course, see it only as a stimulus to faster and more “decisive” military action. So, it will really work on them the way it is wanted. (A) And of course, we wonder how they will make use of this event. A: The primary effect among the masses will be shock, thus making them less resistant to Bush’s policies. Still other groups will see the clear threat to Bush and Co. from their activities. Bush and Co. will, of course, seek to capitalize on the event even while remaining in the dark as to its meaning. But there most certainly is awareness among them that there is a “Maverick” element at loose. Bush has even “felt” a bit of primal fear in respect of this event. Now, to put everything into perspective, let me repeat a quoted selection from the dialogues with Us in the Future that appeared in the Q: (L) I read the new book by Dr. David Jacobs, professor of History at Temple University, [The Threat] concerning his extensive research into the alien abduction phenomenon. [Dr. Jacobs wrote his Ph.D. thesis on the history of the UFOs.] Dr. Jacobs says that now, after all of these years of somewhat rigorous research, that he KNOWS what the aliens are here for and he “is afraid”. David Jacobs says that producing offspring is the primary objective behind the abduction phenomenon. Is this, in fact, the case? A: You. Q: (L) How do you mean? Creating a race to replace human beings, or abducting specific humans to replace them with a clone or whatever? A: Mainly the former. You see, if one desires to create a new race, what better way than to mass hybridize, then mass reincarnate. Especially when the host species is so forever ignorant, controlled, and anthropocentric. What a lovely environment for total destruction and conquest and replacement... see? Q: (L) Well, that answered my other question about the objective. Well, here in the book, Dr. Jacobs says that there is ongoing abductions through particular families. I quote: 367 High Strangeness — Part Three A: As always, confusion is the mask. first part of this book: A: Part, but not “the whole thing”. Q: (L) Is there another dominant reason? A: Replacement. Q: (L) Replacement of what?