Page Content (OCR)
Foreword But if that is the case, then why would the persons making such claims be exempt from this control? Therefore, by logic, anyone who makes such a statement is also being influenced by programming and by satellites (if everybody is, then so is he). If so, then what such a person writes is skewed. And, because such debunkers are often so loud, and so sure, about this subject for no valid reason, it is a logical conclusion that what they are saying is nof true, that the claim that all channeling is crap is, itself, disinformation. So we see that starting from the assumption that such a claim is right (satellites affect everybody), we come to the conclusion that the claim is wrong (because it is simply repeating the satellite disinformation). So, here we have reductio ad absurdum. But we can go even further. Can we find a reason why debunkers would state such evident nonsense with such certainty? Well, here we can have a hypothesis too. If, as we know by the above analysis, not all channeling is from satellites, that some channeling can provide us with real information from “benevolent higher beings”, from “us in the future”, or from “Mind-God and Oversoul”, call it as you will, then it is only natural that there will be forces trying to discredit this channeling. So, we have solved one problem here. If a critic calls all channellers disinformation agents, and if he is right, or even partly right, then we have reasons to suppose that such an individual is an There is one more exercise in logical reasoning and critical thinking that comes to mind. Most critics are not clear about what channeling is, +, .4 a 1 1 ce . a n so let me take the particular example of using the Ouija board, as my wife, Laura, does. Why does she use the Ouija board? Laura went to great lengths to research the subject of channeling before she ever began her experiments. Based on facts and data, it was clear that using a “peripheral device” in a full state of consciousness was the optimum method to screen out noise. In particular, such a method makes it far more difficult for satellites, or other programming signals coming from human and hybrid technology, when and if they come, to affect the message. At least two persons are needed, full consciousness, critical thinking, often coffee, fresh minds, loud discussion of the data as it comes, and the board. Thinking in terms of possible quantum physics involved in mind-matter interactions, it is clear to me that the methods she uses are more likely to be robust and critical fresh minds, shielded shielded against deliberate bombarding from outside by mind controlling signals, whether technological or “psychic”. On the other hand, talking directly to “Mind-God” as so many other channels do is deliberate from outside mind agent of those forces.