Page Content (OCR)
Chapter One In the physical sciences, very often machines and instruments are utilized to “take measurements”. In order to achieve accuracy with even the most precisely tooled device, certain tests are undertaken to establish the “reading error” of the gadget. What we would like to suggest is that the “official culture” that establishes what may or may not be taken “seriously” is a planned and deliberate “reading error” built into the “machine” of science - our very thinking - the suggestions Without a historical context of science, there is little possibility that a sincere scientist - who is generally not much interested in history, based on my own experience - will ever be able to establish the “reading error” of his machine - his thinking. There are only so many hours in the day, only so many days in the year, and only so many years in the life of a scientist. The amount of study that is necessary to discover the threads of “conspiracy”, where they lead to and what they lead to or away from, is actually overwhelming. I know: I've spent about 30 years doing it. What’s more, I began my research from a skeptical point of view that “conspiracy” was paranoid thinking, and I was determined to find the way to demonstrate that there was no conspiracy. I wanted to create categories where anomalies could be discussed rationally within the accepted bounds of our social and cultural constructs. Unfortunately, not only did my plan fail - my hypothesis was utterly demolished by the hard facts. One thing I did learn was that finding those “hard facts” was very difficult and time-consuming. And that is deliberate. After all, how good a conspiracy is it if it is so easily discovered? It is clear that in such a high stakes arena as the Global Control agenda now being overtly pursued by the Bush Reich - after years and years of the “secret science” - whatever conspiracies exist, will be managed with all the resources and power of those elitists who wish to retain control. That is a formidable obstacle. I would also like to mention the fact that, even though I am the one who has collected and sorted data, my husband, a mathematical- theoretical physicist, has assisted me in analyzing it. At first he did it to humor me. And then, as he applied his knowledge of mathematics to the various problems I brought to him, he began to realize that science can be applied to these problems, and once that is done, it strips away the denial mechanism, and one is left with the inescapable conclusion that nothing is as it seems and never has been. We live in an ocean of lies, disinformation, manipulation, propaganda, and smokescreens. 168 of the “hypnotist”.