Page Content (OCR)
This last response only became clear later. We were soon to learn that each session brought forth a different “entity”. As each “moment” in space time was totally unique, so were the energies surrounding us and our questions. Thus a different name of the communicating entity designated a different frequency, though we were told that there were really no “separate” entities communicating. Each session was unique in its question-answer energy exchange. Since my cousin, Sam, had been so devoted to the ideas of Zecharia Sitchin’s The 12th Planet, 1 decided that a couple of questions along that line might be interesting. Sitchin claims in his books that a superior race of alien beings once inhabited our world. He claims that they were travelers from the stars, that they arrived eons ago, and genetically engineered mankind to serve as their slaves. He claims that the “Sons of Anak” mentioned in the Bible are the Annunaki, and also that they are the same as the Biblical Nephalim. They are a race of gold-seeking giants from a renegade planet in our own solar system, known to the Sumerians as the “Planet of the Crossing”. This planet “crosses” the plane of the ecliptic every 3,600 years, and when it gets close enough, these beings make a “hop” to earth to check up on their creation. Supposedly, this will happen again soon. The title comes from the fact that Sitchin proposes 12 houses of the zodiac for 12 “planets”. He includes the Sun and moon in his count because they are zodiacally significant. But, in actuality, it is really a 10th planet, excluding the Sun and Moon. He also fails to note that the Earth is excluded from zodiacal considerations due to the fact that astrology is geocentric. Since Sam was so “sold” on the Sitchin scenario of ancient astronauts, and I was equally convinced that it was a theory that was full of errors, I thought that this would be another good test question. This was proposed by Immanuel Velikovsky as an explanation why ancient astronomers and mythmakers claimed that Venus was born from Jupiter. regarding myth and legend, his observations and proposals of a new way at looking at the cosmos have yet to be fully appreciated. And, according to the Cassiopaeans, he was, at least, partly correct. But, in 157 High Strangeness — Part One Q: (L) Is there a tenth planet as described by Zecharia Sitchen? A: No.[Okay, no point in pursuing that!] Q: (L) Was Venus ejected from Jupiter? The reader will most certainly wish to read Worlds in Collision because it is one of the most rational books ever written. Even if Velikovsky was wrong about some of the conclusions he drew