Page Content (OCR)
Why? I am a scientist. I look at things in a somewhat different way than other people. I am more critical. | am even more critical than most of my colleagues. So, when I see a statements like these, or even “channeling is a satellite transmission” I get very suspicious. Why so? I immediately see that anyone who says things like this is speaking nonsense - in these sentences. And when I see someone speaking nonsense in couple of sentences, and when this somebody is so affirmative - then I can’t take this person seriously in all the rest. Certainly there is a possibility that some (most?) of the channeling today comes via satellites or other means of programming. That is not only possible but probable. The evident answer is: to twist, to disinform, via New Age-type naive people. Based on an assessment of the facts of technology and the morality (or lack of) amongst the Elite rulers of our world, it is highly probable that if there was information that would tend to free humanity from their controls, they would co-opt it immediately exactly as I have described above in my computer analogies. Can the Cassiopaean channeling be disinformation or come as a result of such technology and/or programming? No. Because there are too many instances in which the Cassiopaeans were answering questions to which normal “satellite type” of intelligence, without being able to instantly read the minds of everyone on this planet, could not have had access. " which normal “satellite of to were Therefore, I think the statement that a// channeling is crap and disinformation, and that 95% is via satellites shows that the individuals who make such claims are: This is the main difference between their approach and ours. While we are ready to question everything, and a/ways look for new facts, 13 High Strangeness What are the facts? What are the possibilities? The next question we should ask is : Why? This would not be so easy. We are not naive, we are critical of our work. We think, we analyze, we test and do research. Could some of our “communications” have been influenced this way? Yes. There is such a possibility. Can ail, or even 95% be received this way? a) Unable to think logically, b) Not interested in discovering the truth.