Page Content (OCR)
Washington DC a exopolitics conference called, A Extraterrestrial Civilizations and Global Security Conference, at the earliest possible date. Dan could be assisted by Dr. Salla, Steven Basset and myself among others. This conference would try to differentiate the proper role for global security forces in the overall field of exopolitics and to specifically attempt to sort through all the perceived threats to get focused on the very real threats that do exist. Additionally as the global security activists get their act together, as have the peace activists at the Hawaii conference, they can meet with the peace activists to make peace between the factions and develop a common front and consensus in communications with ET groups. I look forward to the time when Steven Greer and John Alexander sit down at the table and have a dialogue. :-) We may have to create yet another network with a broader constituency than the Exopolitics Institute to move through phase two so please stay tuned. :-) As I envision it, the ET's are intent in forming a network infrastructure from the grass roots up, all around the globe. Some of these networks will give rise to future institutions others will serve their purpose and dissolve and reform into other groups. Keep in mind that networks organize themselves around individual and collective obstacles like water flowing down a rocky stream. People participating in these networks should realize that nobody is indispensable and that both individual or group are always susceptible to being sidelined when their fear or ego become an obstacle to the overall action plan. Network architecture does not waste time trying to argue with anybody, it just deploys around resistance into areas of conductivity and interconnectivity same as a electrical current. Dr. Michael Salla comments: Thanks for this article which raises many important issues. I wish to comment on three of them. The first is the distrust you point out that exists between the peace constituency and the national security constituency. That distrust is very real and does lead to tensions as we all know and means prudence is required in making connections and collaborating where opportunities arise. The historic way in which the extraterrestrial situation has been managed has lead to the fracturing and division of civil society, where resources and skills are skewed in favor of the national security community. The deliberate targeting of civil society by psychological operations has led to much uncertainty as to who among former national security personally are reaching out to civil society to genuinely cooperate, as opposed to those wishing to infiltrate in order to weaken and destabilize. This has been a perennial problem and has led to several civil society organizations being infiltrated and ultimately compromised. For example, what happened to Donald Keyhoe's National Investigative Committee for Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) is one of many examples where such infiltration and subversion occurred to render ineffective an important organization. So the relationship between civil society and the national security community is one filled with both opportunities and risks that need to be approached carefully. The recent ET Civilizations and World Peace Conference was itself the subject of a major psychological operation to destabilize and render it ineffective. Such actions only serve to heighten distrust since they produce an asymmetrical distribution of resources between civil society and the national security community. The second issue is I think the very real conflict between promoting peaceful cooperation with extraterrestrials and national security priorities. This is no academic issue as evidenced by the ongoing campaign to weaponise space in order to target extraterrestrial civilizations as Paul Hellyer and others have noted. Opposition to space weaponisation from civil society is perceived 134