Page Content (OCR)
PART IV 69 and completion of criminal insider activities if the culpable ones know they have nothing to worry about if in the end all will be forgiven. It would be in their best interest to encourage that kind of amnesty so that they may continue operating post-Disclosure, washed clean of their liabilities. To even attempt to offer amnesty, it must be given not only in exchange for truth about the alien presence and suppressed tech- nologies, but for testimony under oath against colleagues and superiors and the complete spilling of guts and handing over of classified information. Then once everyone incriminates every- one else, there should be enough truth on the table to sort out who deserves amnesty and who does not. Those found guilty, including witnesses who have violated their testimonial oaths by operating as pathological disinformants, should be prevented from acquiring any leadership roles in the post-Disclosure world. Whistle-blowers who know they are being sincere have nothing to worry about, while those thinking they can exploit amnesty and advance their covert agenda will be held accountable. It should be done in no less forgiving a manner than how Mafia and crime rings are taken down. It is not about seeking revenge against these criminals or being unspiritual and unmerciful, but safeguarding our future from psychopaths incapable of rehabilita- tion. ‘The practical reality of amnesty, however, brings into question who has the authority and ability to offer amnesty and protect the witnesses? Prior to Disclosure, no one. The black ops networks are so technologically advanced that even under 24-hour police protection (or before a live audience) a witness can be hit with an invisibly projected beam and drop dead from apparent aneurysm or heart failure. Those working for black ops projects have signed documents virtually permitting their own assassination should they ever break their secrecy oaths. The laws governing protection of classified information and national security are also beyond the jurisdiction of the conventional legal system. So it would take an authority more powerful than the entire military-industrial com-