Page Content (OCR)
PART IV $5 cled human and cattle parts and fluids, that would be too uncom- fortable for most people. Mankind keeps ignoring the alien presence, driving aliens into resorting to fear tactics to cut through our ignorance and help us finally acknowledge them. This rationalization presents negative aliens as ignored chil- dren so desperate for attention they turn delinquent. Applying child psychology to advanced aliens is naive at best, although it does serve the strategy of tugging on the heart strings since it paints aliens as innocent, desperate, suffering, and crying for at- tention. Cattle mutilations would be an example of this supposed delinquency. Humans give aliens no recognition, so they slice up some cows to make us take notice. Sounds fine in theory, but the parts removed during cattle mutilations are strategically selected toward extracting valuable substances and building artificial hu- manoids. Not to mention, if aliens wanted to catch our attention they could do better and fly low over major cities during daytime than hurting random cows. Isolated incidences of terrorizing abductions exist, and we must distinguish between these and the majority of abductions that are by benevolent Greys. By now there is enough evidence of negative abductions that it can no longer be suppressed. Instead, here it is being diverted, rationalized, and spun toward preserving the agenda at all costs. Since the exact percentage of negative abductions is unknown, there is room to arbitrarily make up a percentage and have it ap- pear that a good portion is supposedly by benevolent Greys. However, those who forward the idea of benevolent Greys fail to address the possibility of screen memories that paint over nega- tive abductions with the illusion of positive ones. These screen memories are well within standard operating procedures for negative aliens. Without that being taken into account, it cannot