PROJECT BLUE BOOK

-
R. LOCATION 2. CONCLLSIUNS
Mash Was Balta.t
G0U Probobly i. con
4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Possbyeus
3Gmind Virval t Ground-Reder Was Aioratt
000 Peobably dcrcht
DA.rVind C Air-intercept Radar niereopr Kaed Possib'y Arcah
t Cs CS . SOURCE 6. SOURCE 10 Wes Astrononiea!
CYes Probably Astronamical
XNo ZNo eivilians Possibly Astionomicol Possibly Astionomical
7. 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 6. NUWBER OP OBJECTS 6. NUMBER OP OBJECTS 9. 9. COURSE COURSE Other... Other.
Insufficren: Dcta for Evaluction Insufficren: Data for Evaluction
one hour 2 1 Unknown
10. 0. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGNTING 11. 11. COMMENTS COMMENTS
Stationary- Stationary Stationery light, on and brr - po light, on and 1517
a varning a varning bencon in water tank
building.
Report seant - no veathor,
o. obgect above the horison.
ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP S2)

W.Ctai 1-
(
2.Alta
RAD88 ACTION
WPA102 30.flel8
30 001
YDA106 1952
TYE090 7om 28
TDC076 FILED bal
JEPHQ B65
PP JEDUP JEDEN JEPLG 333 -
DE JEPHQ 03A 1
-
P 290538Z ZNJ
FM HQ USAF WASHDC W:2
TO JEDWP/CGAIRDEFCOM ENT AFB COLO
JEDEN/CHIEF ATIC WRIGHT P JEDEN/CHIEF ATIC WRIGHT PATTERSON OHIO
JEPLG/CGTAC LANGLEY AFB VA JEPLG/CGTAC LANGLEY AFB VA
S
I -2C. ONE UNIDENTIFIED OBJECT OBSERVED OVER WASHINGTON CMA D.C. .-
SIZE OF OBJECT COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. NO AERODYNAMIC FEATURES
NOTED. NO TRAIL OR EXHAUST NOTED • OBJECT WAS STATIONARY AND FADED NOTED. NO TRAIL OR EXHAUST NOTED  OBJECT WAS STATIONARY AND FADED .
AND GLOWED AT INTERVALS. OBJECT FLOWED_BRILLIANTLY-FROM WHATAPPEARED
WHO IS A NAVY VETERAN AND CLAIMS TO BE FAMILIAR WITH
ASTRONOMY AND AIRCRAFT TYPES. RELIABILITY UNKNOWN. FIVE OTHER ADULTS
OBSERVED THE OBJECT FOR APPROXIMATELY ONE HOUR. TWO AIRCRAFT
PASSED OVER THE AREA DURING THE OBSERVATION. EACH TIME THE LIGHT
FADED AND REAPPEARED AFTER THE AIRCRAFT HAD PASSED. A VISUAL CROUND
OBSERVATION WIT! BINNOCULARS WAS MADE. WEATHER CLEAR AND VISIBILITY
PERFECT,
29/06412 AUG JEPHQ 7-3719-16
y,

1
PROJECT 1O073 WORKSHEET
I. GENERAL
DATE SCATION TIME
Local:
Iushinstion Zebra:
Cos INo
Nakod Eyo
Binoculars
Toloscope
C7Theodolito
WAS OBJECT OBSERVED BY GROUND RADAR? Yes No
By One Sot
CBy Tro Seta
CBy Thres Set3
WAS OBJECT OBSERVED FROM THE AIR? You CRo
Observed Object
ClInterception Attempted
No Intorcopt Attempted
RCEPT? C1 Yes ETNo
A/C s Scrambled
Visual Contact Made
CiA/I Contact Made
CiNo Contact Mado
S. DID OBJECT CHANGE DIRECTION AT ANY TIEEY Yes
C)Normal
C!Violent
EHlinking
I Stoady
T LENGTH OF 11-15 Seconds
l1-5 Wnutos
17Ovor 10 Mnutes 1n.
11. REPORTING - Address)
g.1i5 Wachniotin. D.C.
II. ASTRONOMICAL DATA
WAS NUTED? No.
13. DID OBJECT APPEAR TO ARCH DO.NRARD? I! Yes
DID OBJECT HAVE A TAIL? !!Yes THHo
5. DID OBJECT APPEAR TO DISINTEGRATE? TiYes RNO
TIME OF SIGHTING RELATIVE TO SUNRISE OR SUNSET (nata From Air Alman
DNight
C! Day
CSunriso
[lSunset
III. AIRCRAFT DATA
17. WERE ATRCRAFT NOTED IN AREA? Yey
!Ono Aircraft
Nore Than One Aireraft
1 WAS ANY SOUND HEARD? Yes
L9. WERE THERE TNDTCATIONS OF RIGN EACKCIOUNU Yes T7Ho
CO. WAS THE OBJECT VIEMED ABOVE L50 ELEVATICN? -ries [1o
ATIC Tast Form 334 (13 Aug 52)

IV. BALLOON DATA
21. WERE EALLOONS RELEASED IN AREA? Yes
RELEASE: Mimutes
OF SIGHTING:
Lighted? Deseribe
Location Typs Launching Agency Yes No Lighting
a. n
b. V.5.Nuo
d.
(attach overlay
V. EVALUATION
21. EVA ION OF BOURCET 22. DETAILS OF REPORT:
Excellent Good
Good Fair
Fair Poor
Poor
Unreliable
Extremely Doubtful
Hoax
23
Was Balloon Was Astronomical
Probably Balloon Probably Assronomical
Possibly Poasibly Balloon O Poasibly Astrenomical Astrvnonical
D Was Alroraft Alrcraft Other
Probably Aircraft
Possibly Aircraft Insufficient
Unknown
24. COL NTSI
1
ArIC Tost Form 33l, (13 Aug 52)