DECLASSIFIEDUSAF PROJECT BLUE BOOK · NARA T-1206
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

PROJECT BLUE BOOK

UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT CASE FILES · 1947 – 1969
CASE REFERENCE7459076
DATE OF SIGHTINGDate not recorded
REPORTED LOCATIONPittsburg Pennsylvania
FRAMES16

Machine transcription · mean legibility 86.5/100 · engines: paddle-gpu-200dpi

Transcribed Frames

FRAME 001 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
I
1
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
1. DA SHAE GROUP 2. LOCATION Z
3 is 04/06552 "lwitness)
2. mAdCL 10. CONCLUSION
Civilian Fess. Pess. ALRGRAFT ALFGRAFT .
1. NUDPPER OF NIPPER OF OBJECTS OBJECTS
Cno
5. LENGTH OF OBSE OBSE VATION ATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
1O minules LO minuies SE CAE FILE S E CAE FILE
6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION b TYPE OF OBSERVATION
Ground Viaval
7. COURSE
NE-M
8. PHOTOS
Noie. Theee is go friinl sorentisee whs has an ehotiieit
r Yrs
3 No
9. PHYSIC IDENCE meA rTtoched sosanipinin ( his phdne ). it scons
207 Pov 7hiT This The sTemits Soa This
LYos Enghtg
Ot No
CORH
PT0 SEP63 0-329 (TDE) Prevlous editions of this form may be ueed.
FRAME 002 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
No
b20 f hilt
22. Where were you located when you saw the object? 23. Were you (Circle One)
(Circle One):
a. In the business section of a city?
a.Inside a building b. In the residantial section of a city?
b. In a car c. In open countryside?
c. Outdoors d. Near an airfield?
d. In an airplane (type) e. Flying over a city?
e. At sea f. Flying over opan country?
f. Other - g. Other
24. IF you were MOVING IN AN AUTOMOBILE or other vahicle at the time, then complete the following questions:
24.1 What direction were you moving? (Circle One)
c. North c. East e. South g. West
b. Northeast d. Southeast f. Southwest h. Northwest
24.2 How fast were you moving? 24.2 How fast wers you moving? 10miles per hour. sto 10 _miles per hour.
(Circle One) (Yes) No
Did you obsarve the object through any of the following?
a. Eyeglasses Yes No e. Binoculars Yes
b. Sun glasses Yes f. Telescope No
c. Windshield Yes No g. Theodolite Yes
d. Window glass Yes) No h. Other
26. In order that you can give as clear a picture as possible of what you saw, describe in your own words a common
abject or objocts which, when placed up in the sky, would give the same appecrance as the object which you saw.
deen diialen te the
Mfit Chill wen cirnfaeet td,
FRAME 003 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
I didt ne it deaveig hyme
hj lihin himl
li2sthn 2
thd  irndndhi it in teeld mil
. IF there was MORE THAN ONE object, then how thany ware there?
Draw a picture of how they were arranged, and put an arrow to show the direction that they were traveling.
FRAME 004 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
wileth tZo
teustibnnt vnitofrytit gg
kt
32. Please give the following information about yourself: 32. Please give the fallgwing information about yours
NAM
First Name
Pittbuyh 15239 Pittolugh 15339 2
ADDRESS
City Zone Zone State
TELEPHONE NUMBE TELEPHONE E NUMBE 35 F
AGE AGE SEX SEX
SP
33. When and to whom did you report that you had sean the object?
Donda april 1967
Day Month Yoar
WTHE
theteewnn
FRAME 005 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
lilt alitthe, the
hs to
nell Tothe
uippe hnd. apisn
mell lle
the batim the thime
LAWSET
FRAME 006 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
726
dava ite that I nrhiial thi ,ap;
aite il heebens chusck
lurk
Coog
Sadnt S nande 22 Darde
15139. addt
bt 9:3pla thehileehlewe
7iestoxolAbst
FRAME 007 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
2 J
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION (AFSC)
WRIGHT-PATT OHIO 45433
REPLY TO TDET/UFO 3 April 1967
ATTN OF
SUBJECT
TO
Pittsburgh nnsylvania 15239
Reference J your unidentified observation. The information which
we have I received is not sufficient t for a scientific evaluation.
Request you complete the attached FTD Form 164 and return it in
the envelope provided Thank you reporting your observation
to the r Force.
JAMES C. MANATT, COlOnel, USAF JAMES C. MANATT, ColOnel, USAF 1 Atch
Director Technology chnology y and Subsystems and Subsystems FTD Form 164 w/envelope
FRAME 008 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
.
".
MENO FOR THE RECORD:
Observer saw an alwainum colored object with bright red lights.
The object was not moving except when the witness would travel
in the car. The object looked as if it was only about 500-700
feet above the car. It looked like thera was a craft on top
of another craft. There was no sound at all during the obser-
vation. The witnesses name is as follows:
Pittsburg, 39, Fa.
T
$fr$
FRAME 009 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
Willias B.Weitzel: President. I Philosophy Instructor, University
of Pittsburgh, Bradreid-Campus. Three years physics training at MIf; The RESEAROHER:
MA in Thilosophy( WCAP staff member during summer of 1966. Published
recount of Portede County (April 1966) UFO/police "chase"; has V.1
given tio telks.
1 Ophtalnic io vith Drs. Linn, Man Sr., NO.2
4 Shatret. Former KP with U. S. Marine Corps. Made pictures of
burned retina of UFo witness, who sufiered eye damage. One of three
Institute people who are ready to handle on-going UFO sightings Jin/ Joly 68
reported to answering service (telephone number 391-2766).
FLYING SAUCER FROM MARS DISCOVERED
An on-the-spot Institu investigation recently verified I the 4
existence of a "Flying Fron Mars," which has accounted for
many UFO sightings in the ttsburgh area. The object is a Citabria ..
Champion advertising plane flown by Eiler, Culmerville Airport,
and bears the above quoted inscription with the and bears the above quoted inscription with the qualification qualification "Pa." "Pa."
in small letters after "Mars." Mr. Eiler Mr. Eiler AAA Sky Adds, Inc.
The wingspan of the Citabria The wingspan of the Citabria ("airbatic" spelled backwardsis
36-l/2 feet. It usually flies at an altitude an altitude of about 1,000 feet, of about 1,000 feet,
around 70 mph, and around 70 mph, and can stay aloft over five hours. Mounted below the
wings is a framework of wires to which are soldered 7 rows of 36 CM5l rows of 36 CM5l
bulbs, the size of a flashlight bulb. A heavy tape with holes punched bulbs, the size flashlight bull heavy tape with holes punched
in it to spell out a message, funs through a machine inside the plane in it to spell message, funs -
which makes the bulbs light up in ertain sequence, to make the
message move across the lights. An siren mounted below the plane
is sometimes used to attract attention.
In a strong headwind, at an airspeed of 30 mph, the Citabria can
appear to be standing still. Seen on edge, its lights, moving from
a flattish object with
plane is inaudible
at a distance from which the moving lights can be easily seen; thus, Obiis "sipled
many people report seeing a silent, disc-shaped object with a_rotating "Red hights -These cicnted
rim covered by equally-spaced lights. When the plane is flying direct- Thi estiqe ship rbout
ly toward or away fron the observer, especially in a misty atmosphere, 6 FT. dpnT
its appearance can be quite eerie.. It can, as several reports have
stated, definitely "not resemble any conventional aircraft"! 2
-6-
FRAME 010 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
Request surface wind direction and velocity for
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 3April 1967, 2000 hours,
EST.
N
TDPT (UFO) Lt Mareno 23 Apr 68
70916
3
FRAME 011 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL APPLICATIONS CENTER (MACI
BLDG I39 NAVY YARD ANNEX, WASHINGTON, DO 20353
A
REPLY TO
ATTN OF: ETAC/EAD (#5992D/SSgt Dunham) 7 May 68
SUBJECT: Request for Weather Data
TO: FTD (TDPTR4)
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433
1. Surface wind data required to complete the evaluation of a reported
UFO sighting at Pittsburgh, Pa., on 3 April 1967 at 2oooL hours, was not
available. However, as a possible aid to your evaluation, the surface
wind at 1900L hours on 3 April 1967 was 310 degrees at 14 knots.
2. Data sources were the ETAC surface history files.
FOR THE COMMANDER
D Meat lotw
JOHN T. MeCABE, JOHN T. McCABE, Colonel, USAF Colonel, USAF
Chief, Environmental Chief, Environmental Applications Div.
FRAME 012 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
means the only case reported in that area.
spate of reports, apparently all through the year, and ev , as late
as November 3, 1967, when , made a typicai ;e en-
counter,luminous body sighting. It was big enough to drive a car
in", said, was shaped like a cigar - one eud was
round."
I believe there is a moral to be drawn from the Wellington case.
Had the Altus Air Force Base reacted promptly and done a good investi-
partiruiar, had
found out how Mr. had come into possession of said pictures, a
preferential interpretation their sighting. The sighting was of
short duration and the telescopic sighting was 20 seconds or less,
hardly enough time to make a cold a appraisal at a time of high excite-
ment. Proper investigation at the local level could have easily
determined how much of this Cerpretation and how much was fact.
whatever is given to the sanity and reliability of the observer. If
it was an aircraft, then it created in the mind of the observer an
entire fantasy, because as the observer stated, "there is no object
I've ever seen similar to this object I saw. Or could even compare
to it."
FRAME 013 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
With respect to the light, witness stated, "there is nothing I know
of, or that I've ever seen with r I lights that were as vibrant or
as brilliant".
Finally, witness became frightened because object appeared so
close directly over her car, and yet said there was no sound at all.
Unless one is willing to call this an absolute hallucination, and
that there was no physical outfit present whatever, the evaluation
"aircraft" simply
This case is sufficiently interesting for me to interviow the
witnesses, as there were two rather than one as stated. Thcy were
independent and talked about it only after each had seen separately.
I will make this personal investigation and report later.
23. 3 April 1967, Roseville, Michigan.
I would agree with the evaluation of possible birds, bu: ;
suppose to be fair we should also add, possible unidentified (uata
observed flying in V formation. This actually strengthens the
rginia.
25. 5 April 1967, Westmi ister, Colorado
Since the 164 was not returned the evaluation "insufficient data",
I suppose, is entirely correct, but the case itself is interesting
in that there were 15 witnesses. Here is one case the Coudon Committee
should have looked into, since it was right at their back door. They
should have looked into it particularly since there were l5 witnesses.
AIso the object was visible for 15 minutes, and it was observed through
a telescope. Even at this late date this might be worth a call. As
a matter of fact, when I am in Boulder this July I will look into it
myself, but for the statistics, the evaluation "insufficient data"
certainly holds.
FRAME 014 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
Please try to answer as many questions as you possibly can. The information that you give will
be used for research purposes. Your name will not be used in connection with any statements,
conclusions, or publications without your permission. We request this personal information so
that if it is deemed necessary, e may contact you for further details.
1. When did you see the object? 2. Time of day: 7 55
Hour Minutes
nonda 1967
(Circle One): A.M. or P.M.
Day Month Year
3. Time Zone:
(Circle One): (Circle One): a? a: Eastern a. Daylight Saving Daylight Saving
b. Central Central Srandard Standard
c. Mountain
d. Pacific
e. Other Other
4. Who object?
Pehinghe
Nearest Postal Address City or Town State or County
5.How long was object in sight (Total Duration) 10
Hours Minutes Seconds
o. Certain c. Not very sure
b. Fairly certain.
5.1 How was time in sight determined?
5.2 Was object in sight continuously? Yes No
What was the condition of the sky?
DAY NIGHT
a. Bright G. Bright
b. Cloudy b.
(Circle One): a. In front of you d. To your left
b. In bock of you e. Overhead
c. To your right f. Don't remember
FORM
FRAME 015 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
a. None 2. Bright moonlight
b. A few b. Dull moonlight
c.Many c. No moonlight - pitch dark
d. Don't ramamber d. Don't remember
9. What were the weather conditions at the time you saw the object?
CLOUDS (Circle One): WEATHER (Circle One):
a. Clear sky aDry
b. Hazy b. Fog, mist, or light rain
c. Scattered clouds C. Moderate or heavy rain
Thick or heavy clouds d. Snow
. e. Don't remember
10. The object appeared: (Circle One):
a.Solid d. Asplightset frist
b. Transparent e. Don't remember
c. Vapor ihinit lilh
If it appeared as a light, was it brighter than the brightest stars? (Circle One):
.Brighter c. About the same
The edges of the object were:
(Circle One): a. Fuzzy or blurred e. Other
b. Like a bright star
c.Sharnly outlined
d. Don't remember
. Did the object: (Circle One for each question)
a. Appear to stand still at any time? Yes No Don't know
b. Suddenly speed up and rush away at any time? Yes No Don't know
c. Break up into parts or explode? Yes No Don't know
d. Give off smoke? Yes No Don't know
7e. Change brightness? Yes No Don't know
F. Change shape? Yes No Don't know
g. Flash or flicker? it Luned I pol sat Yes No Don't know
h. Disappecr and reappear? net wtiit i Yes No Don't know
et
FRAME 016 / 016paddle-gpu-200dpi
16. Did the obiect move in front of something at any time, oerticularly a sloud?
(Circle One): Yes No Don't Kngw. IF you answared YEs, then tell what
in front of: .
17. Tall in a few words the following things about the object:
SoundLsseatull
6. Colorseliihidalie
18. We wish to know the angular size. Hold a match stick at arm's length in line with a known obinct and note how
much of the obiect is covered by the head of the match. if you had performed this exoeriment at the time of the
Place an arrow besids the drawing to show the direction the obiect was moving.
Igasn
24 cincle of itite en yeen, pole yel
AcT0al RE08536s Y00 LiGpts orih sve in cuatce
LL Io See i/ Tne Berran STRULTIRES
THE CRAYE Finlke
MCTAL LERE YOU ENEO AICHTS -TOSE ERCLIO The
VICLVLTFNOATNS EVTIRL DHIP AOOT SET APART.
S18e-VV, v6. IHe LON6TH
LE The StiA MiRe diNe A