PROJECT BLUE BOOK

I
1
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
1. DATE· TIME GROUP 2 LOCATION
3 Nov. 66 3 Nov. 66 4/0002z 4/0002z Monroe, New York Monroe, New York two witnesses two wicnesses
3. SOURCE 3. SOJRCE 10. CONCLUSION . CONCLUSION
Civilian Civilian
Aircraft(possible) 12μ4 24 Poor data data.
4. NUMBER OF NUMBER OF OBJECTS OBJECTS
One One
5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 11, 11, BRIEF SUMMAR BRIEF SUMMAI ANALYSIS
5 minutes 5 minutes . Cbservers noted a star shaped object moving very fast
6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION low on the horizon. Green and red colors s were noted
during the observation. The object moved from West
Ground Visual. to East and appeared to stop on occasion.
7. COURSE Observer claims that he has seen several UFOs before
Eastward in the "light in the sky" category
8. PHOTOS
Investigating officer feels that the witnesses saw .
Yes and reperted an aircraft. No other evidence to the
No contrary has been offered.
2. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
17 Yos
No
FORM
FTD SEP 63 0-329 (TDE) Previoue editione of this form may be used.
.
.
3 . .
.
.
:
*
*
.

,'
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AlC
HEADQUARTERS 46O3D AIR BASE GROUP (ADC)
STEWART AIR FORCE BASE, NEW YORK 12550
ATTN OF: REPLY TO
4603ODC 28 November 1966
SUBJECT: UFO Report
TO: FTD (AFSC)
The attached report is submitted in accordance with paragraph 8,
AFR 80-17.
FOR THE
D. C. BOYD, Lt COl, USAF D. C. BOYD, Lt COl, USAF
Chief, Operations & Training Division Chief, perations Training Division
*
.

A. Description of the Object(s):
1. Shape: Shaped like a star, but was moving very fast. It appeared to be low
on the horizon and was blinking.
3. Color: Green and red
4. Number: One
5. Formation, if more than one: None
6. Any discernible features or details: m None
7. Tail, trail, or exhaust, including size of same compared to size of object(s):
None
are interested in the UFO Program and spend considerable time watching for them.
elevation measurements were taken but the object appeared low on the horizon about
15 miles away. Appeared to be over or in the vicinity of Newburgh, NY.
3. Angle or elevation and azimuth of object(s) upon disappearance:
No angular measurements were taken. The object disappeared over the horizon.
-.

4. Description of flight path and maneuvers of object(s): It moved from West
to East and appeared to op on occ
5.1 How did the object oved over the horizon.
C. Manner of Observation:
1. Ground - visual
2. Optical Aids: None
3. N/A
D. Time and Date of Sighting:
1. Zulu time-date group of sighting: 0002,4 Nov 66 Zulu time-date group of sighting: - 0002,4 Nov 66
2. very clear night.
E. Location of Observer(s): Monroe, New York
1. Military or
2. Name: Mr. and
3. Age: 3. Age: 24 24
4. Mailing Address: 4. Mailing Address: nroe, N.Y. oe, N.Y.
5. Occupation: Sander in the Paint Shop for cor Company Company
6. Estimate of Reliability: Mrs is 95% deaf according to
2 Mr. s color blind. He was very excitable when talking on the telephone. -
I feer he accurately reported what he saw but does not have the background nor the
training to distinguish what he saw from aircraft in flight.
×
.

G.
ons:
3. Ceiling: 3. Ceiling:
4. Visibility:
5. Amount of cloud cover:
6. Thunderstorms in area and quadrant in which located:
7. Vertical temperature gradient:
ndition:
a a
I. I. Interception or Identification Action Taken: Interception or Identification Action Taken: -
3
×

a "light phenomena"
shape.
I feel that he is sincere and accurate in his reporting but he is unable to offer any
information that could be scientifically investigated. The object he has reported
could very easily have been aircraft traffic around Stewart AFB. No other evidence could very easily have been aircraft traffic around Stewart AFB. No other evidence
to the contrary has been offered. to the contrary has been offered.
WILLIAM J ARCHIBALD, Capt ,USAF
Investigating Officer Investigating Officer
L. I
II
4