PROJECT BLUE BOOK

UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT CASE FILES · 1947 – 1969

CASE REFERENCE8722159

DATE OF SIGHTINGDecember 1964

REPORTED LOCATIONCudahay Wisconsin

FRAMES5

→ Original microfilm scan (PDF) → Return to index

Machine transcription · mean legibility 66.5/100 · engines: tesseract-200dpi

Transcribed Frames

FRAME 001 / 005tesseract-200dpi

1, D4 “E - TIME GROUP

2. LOCATION

18 December 64 19/030pz

3. SOURCE
Civilian

4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS

One

——EE

10. CONCLUSION
UNRELIABLE RPORT

Conflicting data in report.

5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION /|11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS

7 Secons

6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION

Ground~Visual
7. COURSE

___ South
8. PHOTOS

0 Yes
XOUNe
9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE

O Yes

XE No

FORM
FTD sep 43 0-329 (TDE)

eclipse. Sphere shaped,
Flight from NE to South.
ram the witness,

Previous editions of thie form may be used.

Cudahay, Wisconsin

No object observed in conjunction with the Lunar Eclipse.

Regarded as an unreliable report.

—

Object in sight for 7 seconds. Observed to leave area of lu

Color change noted. Fast speed,
Object seemed like it was going to

ar

et ee + ee ere ee eee

FRAME 002 / 005tesseract-200dpi

3 March 1965

Dear Mr i.

This is in reply to your recent letter in which you
related an observation of an object which you could not

identify.

From the information which you submitted, the duration,
speed, and are distance would indicate a meteor observation;
however, the description including the color change is not
consistent with this analysis. Your statement that the object
seemed like it was going to ram you is not in accordance with
the flight path from northeast ending in the south unless there
was a change in course of the object.

Analysts at the Project Blue Book investigation office are
unable to determine the cause of your observation. However,
you can be assured that no unusual object or phenomena was ob-
served in conjunction with the lunar eclipse on 13 December 1964.

Sincersly,

JOBN P, SPAULDING

Lt Colonel, USAF

Chief, Civil Branch
Commmity Relations Division
Office of Information

/

FRAME 003 / 005tesseract-200dpi

HEADQUARTERS CoS
; FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION )

AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO

REPLY TO
ATTN OF:

sussect: UFO Sighting (18 Dec 64, Cudahy, Wisconsin)

ro: HQ USAF SAFOI PB (
Wash DC 20330

1. Reference the attached letter £r reporting
an unidentified flying object observed on Dec 64 over

Cudahy, Wisconsin.

TDEW

3 2. The Lunar eclipse of 18 Dec 64 was observed by many astronomers,
both professional and ameteur, continuous photographs were made.
No objects were reported from these observations.

3. From the information which presented to us it seems

that the duration, speed and arc stance traveled would indicate

a meteor observation, however, the description including color
change is not consistant with this analysis. The statement that the
objects seemed like it was going to ram him is not in accord with
the flight path from northeast ending in the south, unless there
was a change in course of the reported object.

4. Analysts are unable to determine the cause of his observation.
However, we can assure Leslie that no unusual object or phenomena 1
was observed in conjunction with the lunar eclipse.

FOR THE COMMANDER

roy ¢ 1 Atch
Colonel, USAF a/s
eputy for Technology

and Subsystems

YOU - THE NUCLEUS OF SECURITY!

FRAME 004 / 005POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

>
: -~ %
| <2 — --—- ~~ Pits a1. 5_ -
(/ ¢
| Orson, Wr cora tn
: oe a ee = : = — me ——————— Eee ee —_———-_----—--—
; Pep.

© \ \% \ 6% Fu-rg = 4
== Crore a cnia Nien andes L\_ neg le ola, ch Qari kt Sumo —
U ré) } €

>.
*

’

o* = { f \ ‘ ; t

- ~ se >) . = 5 ms , =. 4- ‘ = ‘“ ~>
APOA QA’ 3G Yc. wl muinant DD UO DS Ute wow Ws pA
: Sie eS r i
SoTL A. BOAT cnr aac ee. SEE Sev) ape » aoe es Fe Paw YAY Mess cies ts One Oe On eo, eo, ee
j _¢ i : 7 N

é . - ‘ ‘ ;
JU AD NO METS BT NLS OS MN Ly
) RASS BINA MSO. dayne rh.) Not ry ate ALLO Os
J .  ¢
( - ; f : f “ e tions ee, eee ea a | ,
-~ ; - ~ ~~
j NAA UDA KY A on OS to of SRO ros.
; ¥ '
) cy \- \ \ ,
Sine © ra HMGAX WIAs G ADinard-
‘
by | 1%) ‘ t f f Jo 4 : a. ~ f
} Y ADR carer Of 2 OULETE Changi.
- 4 '
~
~~ : fh . bad |
tr . * - - “ a <5. +)
. 9p shise 3O.S cia | ~ar- = ’
1
ee ¥ ’ . . |
j t my ’ ' . $
we KA MAUS COWR Ay rary Tir SAA BALS Pro} BAQ.. SIMO. |

f ’ . a
\ = - .
a A Al iar sho oh oe er KI S Ve saye @ 4 i te ava e 1s . j
~ Vv

i eee . ‘. ae (ge
S$ wit winks wo OE on syd enon SOT F&F aw Leh ta can Ly

he Dour 2 |

a | ‘
‘ ;’
- ‘ i a. i
. : & . ; + ‘ at = . . . . .
— vet ~_ ede tA = Tas sal pwn © SPF IX a a N oe ->~ ~~ Aw > = + pe Sa eee! f =
d ,
- t t.

. ~~ on . ‘ ~ a = 1 , — cen Bi ro. ‘ on

DABS , See oe Cee) oe UN}, ASTM ak Le :

j / / : / 4
/
\

‘ ' ‘
st Z oe a n oa \« \ ‘ . ~* ' ss
' a ee . ii) ‘eS _3 Sa a=. = 5 ; Az a, | ray a. My whet § } ~ Pee ertten. sem teh ~ LL as a — *

FRAME 005 / 005POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

. - . al =~ , tel : wel. 6 nat tent, > + = ee En GS +1
: : . \ ‘ ~ | ~~», + 7”)

; ’ s t “ .* 4 > ' ‘ ~~

; 4 \ — a SY A 4 *- — OAL ay. ‘

|
~ vw\ -\ KL Yay we Soe — _-— J ta es? @