PROJECT BLUE BOOK

PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD
1.DATE 2. LOCATION 12. CONCLUSIONS
11 Veb 64 Brooklyn, New York Was Balloon
000 Probably Balloon
3. DATE-TIME GROUP 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Possibly Balloon
Local_ Ground-Visual Ground-Radar 0 Was Aircraft
00 Probably Aircraft
CMT__12/04157 AirVisual Air-Intercopt Radar Air-Intercspt Radar Possibly Aircraft
PHOTOS 3. 5. SOURCE SOURCE 0 Was Astronomical
.Yes 0 Probably Astronomical
No civilian 0 Possibly Astronomical Possibly Astronomical
7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS . COURSE 9. COURSE 0 Other Other
Insuifi cient Data Insuificient Data for for Evaluation
few seconds mltiple *(8) South East 0 Unknown
BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING SUMMARY OF SIGHTING 11. COMMENTS
obse: obse: eight white objects between Possibly reflections of some sort.
buildings. Ran to corner in time to see them corner in time to see them Possibly a meteor (bolide). Data too
disappear. Object moving in a straight line Ob,ject moving in a straight line brief for evaluation.
to the SE. Objects were oval shaped and white
and appeared to have substance. About 3/4
diameter of moon and almost as bright. No sound.
The Brooklyn case of ll Februery would really have been a good one for the
Abospherte Opties group. Even at this late date, I think we'll try to follow
this up, beeause this chap Laufer sald that he vonld be glad to supply aay further!
inforration. You realize that his drawing is quite similar to the original Arnold
sieiting?
1
ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP 32)
.

which is a row of
--
white objects
cond they passed KEXMAXEMH church
where I first saw them, to behind the apartment buildings.
jects were the XKkx objeots
street.
Throughout all of this time the objects moved in a straight
line toward the Southeast.
After this I ran to my home ( half a block awway )
and drew t the enclosed sketch, It is a representation of how t
the soane locked fron where I first sighted the objects. The
white. They seemed
vary slightly fuzzy the edges as though they might
be glowing. I could see
about three-fourths the EKXE diameter of the noon and a1~
most as bright t as the full moon. I heard no sound as they
passed over. They didn't emit any engine nolse or such

-2-
sound. The following morning, February 12, 1964, I called the
I was told by the seargeant on duty that such matters were
handled by your office and that I should write to you.
were
you
suggest for this sighting?
I will be glad to supoly any further infornation if
necessary.
Thank you.
Very truly yours, Very truly

IN
TMENT 2
4X008
.0
TUES.2/1/

N
4
2
Erooklyn, New York Erooklyn, New York 11230 11230
FEBI3 FEB:3
4. AM 4. AM
64
Office óf the Secretarv of the Air Force
Fublic Information Branch
Washington 25, D.C.
bene 12 4
**
II

—
HEADQUARTERS
FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OMIO
REPLY TO
ArIN of: TDEW
BUOJECT: UFO Sighting (ll Feb 64) 1364
rO: Hq USAF SAFOI-PB (Mrs Gaiser)
Wash 25 D C
1. Reference the attached letter from requesting
information on a UFo Sighting.
2. The information letter, regarding his sighting
of 1l Feb 64, contains most of the essential information necessary
for evaluation. However, no positive identification can be made
on a sighting this brief. There is a possibility of light reflections
of some sort and while the objects did not have tails and appeared to
be in two lines rather than one, a meteor cannot be ruled out. No be in two lines rather than one, a meteor cannot be ruled out. No
other reports were received from the New York area at this time.
FOR THE COM FOR THE IANDER VDER
e a
JONCKHE 1 Atch
Ccolonea, USAF OColoneZ, USAF Ltr Ltr
beputy for Technology Deputy for Technology
and Subsystems
T

reflections of some
sort, and while the objeots did not have tails and
appeared to be in two lines rather than one, a one, a meteor meteor
cennot be ruled out. No other cannot be ruled out. No other reo received eived
from the New York area at this from the New Y area as 13 time.
We are 1 We are
Air Foree program with respect to Unldentifiod Flying
Objeets. It is hoped that this Fact Sheet will be It is hoped that this Faot Sheet will be
of interest to you and will help to explain why a
sighting may remain "Unidentified" even though it con- sighting may remain "Unidentified" even though it con-
tains all pertinent data necessary tains all pertinent data necessary to auggest at to ouggest least
one valid one valid hypothesis on it 3 ei
Sincerely,
MASTON M. JACKS
Major, USAP
Public Inrormation Division
office of Information
1 Attachment
Brooklyn 30, New York

inas6
BROOKLYN 36,N.Y. *
DEPT. OF THE AIRFORCG WASHINGTON 2S,D.C.
DEAR SIRSI
SEVERAL WEEKS AGO
DEPARTMENT AGOUT WROTE TO THIS
OSJECTS I SOME UNIDENTFIED FLYING
THING FROM HAD SEEN. I HAVE HGARD NO-
YOUR DEPT. you MAY
MY DIGHTINE MOD AND CONSIDER
SENT YOU THE INFORMATION T
ASKED A ASRED TRIUIAL , BUT I DONT. I TRIUIAL , BUT I DONT. I
A COUPLE of Of QUESTIONS QUESTISNS
LETTER. LETTER. I wOULD IN My
THEM. TE A RERLY TO
WERE F THERG ANY OTHER
SIGHTINGS THAT NIGHT FEB, NH) ? THAT NIGHT FEB, HTA) ? REPORTS REPORTS oF OF
WHAT COULD COULD you
WHAT I I sAW? SUGGEST As A CAUSE OF

DROOKLYN 28IN.Y.
6 MAR 6 MAR 1964
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON 25, DC. WASHINGTON 25, DC.
3 SAFOI
UFs