PROJECT BLUE BOOK

UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT CASE FILES · 1947 – 1969

CASE REFERENCE9316119

DATE OF SIGHTINGOctober 1962

REPORTED LOCATIONMoorehead Minnesota

FRAMES4

→ Original microfilm scan (PDF) → Return to index

Machine transcription · mean legibility 46.9/100 · engines: tesseract-200dpi

Transcribed Frames

FRAME 001 / 004tesseract-200dpi

PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD

1. DATE 2. LOCATION 12. CONCLUSIONS
4 O Was Balloon
29 October 1962 oorehead, M@nnesota Q Probably Balloon
13. DATE-TIME GROUP 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION O “Possinly Bajloon
Local {X Ground. Vi sual CO Ground-Rodor “ Probebly Aireratt
GMT 29/2200Z D Air Visual O Air-Intercept Radar 0 Possibly Aircroft
5. PHOTOS 6. SOURCE O Was Astronomical
0 Yes O Probably Astronomical
xNo Civilian O Possibly Astronomical
7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | 9. COURSE O Other |
ar camp aens Data for Evoluction| |
QO Unknown
1-2 minutes one ENE
10, BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING 11. COMMENTS.
Witness cou]d not describe obj, only} Total duration assumed to includ
that it was comparable to a small the obsvation of the smoke. Beligqu
a/c in size, had blue white flames to be meteor or decay by the

and a lot of smoke. Obj was believed| investigating officers, No decay
to hit ground in the ENE flight had for this date associated with
slow descent, the time of sighting. Possibly
a daylight meteor; however, the
data is not sufficient for this

evaluation, Case listed as
insufficient data.

ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP 572)

FRAME 002 / 004POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

=
'
mK
ie
oo
rit
mn
N
~~, \
Y
fn
“)
~,

ee

~

i > ee ee ‘Gh PY Pte PAIAVWTIS. 4Os
, ee es? Exe ue © EO J dad s% Gis Ghy jf Ae &: Gee /
—_—_——_—— ¥
| (_—— .
‘ AD Dan
|

mre SITlPnAaAr ‘
a Ad ant nM watiil’ 7 4
i
C—O
4 hol Bae oS slo
’ [ 4
= 7 ” om eo?
i g SLITS « ah nm
( . rT ast ‘* » ‘one fs 7 ie, . ~ “+e -
si Wa. edi a watdh ‘ta GHAI L AS 32% sts & Sesser i (

~

;
:
+o nN . on ee ~ = -
/ j ns :
4 ee J af . ea sas & Ww as 14 op
ve

, 1 ? -_
r ' {

} ; tr re Fs - "rT a o - ’ - Lee ' “) >” J

‘ ‘
? o > in we | aa i NS > wih - ~ tie = , —— ‘
. Pa a
—_ —

i

’ ae |) on Ff ~ T(r Tt _* .

' ; ’ - ‘ =~
q es / ‘ - ) . ° a V ea a « ~)
' -

+r a. 2 2 te °o- -*- “Fr _—o-TN
r 2) -
ns oe f i se \ . i ei ne
4
’ ‘ ' ‘ (
‘ .
. Jorn sé . , +f - ’ . vs .
jan fi Th ~ ~~ - : ‘ Lest . ai ~~
‘

a ibaa a) pr « . om , ~~
at A ebng WHT O7%h AT SOT erg,
Jit dts * We i , ws 32's , o= ms Lice sta ws TTY a we | ae
” -~ “rf : - ~ aie ~ oem r- reer . my . oo ~+ Pe
} . bad : ese “2 o { 4
4 mor. ie e 4 not OW oe Pal ys — bd id = 9 wi “ 49 Vachs ‘ " “te
—

~~

oe a Be ore “*

a e eee a »*

om, ao ny : fa ~* ap me o-$ pareve ean TOA TY TAR Pan--
s-Lsv iVice C4) ws Ode @ C5) ivsasle (5) ‘ © C7) j u Liv Pe hks ad

- CT / ) ‘7 (S) . . (1) — ‘T at +n mie y = 4
tn a es . . be \4ivaene © 7 2 bows. V¥ ic ®e ~~ * . j vy . a: +i a = '
"
. - = ray , . , ,
;
wv , . é: 6 ‘ ‘ = ont we ot aa e . a #7 S' 5 a oO S be ae od . . ‘ = ** <4 |
{
,rmee ¢ ‘ att} . sian r - re 9 +. P r a . .
| * | Tt ’ ! j = j
bsweriaidtoo . tue a 4 4 \ UV , 9 : !
é

FRAME 003 / 004POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

a

)

} -
tee \

.
sta
. Ale
~
, -

—

/

. iP 4
‘YT '
a | '
ant 8

. ~Y
er

- .
se «lew @
» 1)
/
+ mee weed
~e oe r
2 é -
' re,

“™
+ ‘
i
eo**

or > ha e a ** * mete
/ bas Waa © vi in Lie / .* .
Mai’ - . ~ 1) re ~* a
ed ‘ . ‘* \ & - e 4 lw ‘ .
é
‘ » ‘ ~ ~ A sr ~
eS er ae ~~ 96d De e a be ad a ' e4v@ewu ds
/ . /
~ - ~ ° . i -
ihe VOR s- 56
~~ ad ~~ ¥ SD Dh nd ad bd . / an “
*
. ec, . ™} . P= a)
ee awsd# ‘ ° se An - _ IAs ~4
7 ~ e417 ,? ; — - i ae -~
* - . \ tice eee — - — 9 ad
/
— ~ t? a t . a ~~
~ ai
wee i iu WU ~~ le Pibtawe a “j-~
C Ps 4c ee, a + . ' of
. +s 3 me oo Ju et dan a \
oon ~ 4 +? -
4) — lid :
oot 9 st od - hag = : ;
¢
eves ' - " ~ ~ ~
‘ad ‘ > ‘ =
-_*n* - - . , 2 @& ad ud 4
- /
* ‘ vt .
; ’ -
. bee J - “9~ J ad ba = “=
. rc¥ - a * “* an
ae ber OE bus et ie > +++set tb @ is ye
-_. _ . + ~eome- —) —
i ' ;
eee ee 3 ae ata ~/ ob ak O WS: Es iv il 2s
~ eer o 7 ~?
sUU Lis f
= . - i | _— * o_ *-* .

— ek é ta
oO . .

j -
ed ‘ thet y

ce a he) rv
‘ s . sm»
meee ' . a
es #b bee ‘ :

~~ 2 ~
wh id P

© J id =

4

.* ~~

t 4 ,

~
; ‘ ¢«
—~ + ,
_ ,
> a hl
’ . o
: " . / ©
/
~ ’ -
“9 fs
*
| +
rf
Hh. - *
. © “an on
; —
re | i ae |
—“  ~ +e we wee
-~ Wdtts & 4 @

-
- ‘ ~*®
. 4
s i ‘ >
. " . es

,
a
. 5 “* A 4
‘ “ & ean —
/
7) > 4 3% +6
bis beast
" ,AT Sf +
eee ; us S
a ~~ + 2
* .
JJ 30 / 4)
Ji (Os .
-
¢ <a =

am .
b ,
nd tS a
*
a . .
-
A t= ‘ **
. Tf t -
aot et a |
, ,
, . ~~
*
. . -
.* Raev/id _*
/
wmmer > oe on oes

¢

© ae J i

ws

-~ sy

OC ud ad nd
/
~
- Ww
-, _" -~
st 9 ie

Pe
-
--
sé
~o-
se

on

~~ @0

FRAME 004 / 004POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

--* | % . . . "oo rc --7* + . ‘ ’ Pr | . . ae +=
LDL PAT LING (OR PAE © yee Bs: is , J oe oe ‘ shes Pe Bw t
- es nm . ore 7 - - rr - . ; aie - . __— .
| ; | ‘ | i
2 WS « siaa | / Ss = wie i J . i i wiehia 2 i si qs ‘ 4 Laed
** . . ‘* ere rene . - a, ~~ . ; sf -* ‘ — ° re -—er
\ 7 | +) | | rity
ww wee WS Le ‘ ey ‘ i L. é ° ; \ ‘ oe tf id é re > oe dds 6 oe oe we |b a | 9: .* -.iv
eer . i. a ~ * . . a ner, '* oe mee . ‘ ne . oy
| 1} LEONG PST | mY
4s ow é 4 4* eo 2b a¥u Jeilascwr—~ 8 we @ oS +* » »! ow ‘ as ind s ‘ 4 ie 5
“a - tee a ae Ieee at ho a Se .
4 i ' 4
ba ws PV 2 aii . AA i hb hiesow ao 9
- +

RESULTS. NUMEK
FARGO) FAILED TO
=D INITIALLY

° nT nT ~ r fr a a

sete dod ard & —* Pw de kb he dS silavla VP oo On © BO,
Spare. “ot — meee - wee Th la ho a) a eee ~ err rma tae aa

4 by . : }
; VUILALHK (Lissviwwihoe Le & tno k ee te Dare Mey VVINL RG i ha ty
AT a “= } TKI 2 ENT ATT TPT : a 4° Ts © he Be *-. . rTM
ri oP! bo base eh V ALiiLi iy © ip Tehed A te re i | VY bwcs hb
>

~ 2

ARI

C aD | |
a et he -.

oe