PROJECT BLUE BOOK

PROJECT 10073 RECORD
1. DATE · TIME GROUP LOCATION
6June 60 07/0155Z Union City, Indiana (1 Witness)
3. SOURCE. 0. CONCLUSION
Civilian INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR EVALUATION
4. NLIMBER OF OBJECTS PHOTO: No di scernible can be identified.
One
LENGTH OF OBSERVATION AND ANALYSIS
Not Reported Object was flying W to E. It was quite high. Flying boig fas
and made no conconsation trail, but the pattern that appears
6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION arourd it was not visible to the naked eye. The sun was
Ground-Visual behind the observer xaist when he took the picture. Observer
7. COURSE stated the photo was not a double exsposure.
E
8. PHOTOS
MXYes.In.File
No 0No
9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE /
07 Y.s 07 Yes
N XNo
FORM
FTD SEP 63 0-329 (TDE) Prevlous oditlons of this form mey bo ueed. FTD SEP 63 0-329 (TDE) Provlous editlone of this form mey bo ueed.
1
.

Unio Cy Indiana
FTD (TDETR) 6 JUNe 1960
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433
14 October 1966
390
Dear
Please excuse the delay in replying to your letter of 25 April l966.
Your photo camera data was sent to photo analyst personnel, here
at Wright-Patterson AFB. Their only comments were that there was
IT no discernible object that could be identified on the photograph and
that the light colored areas on the photograph could have been caused
by sun flare.
Since you stated in your letter that we may keep the photo, we are
placing it in the case files with your report. Thank you for reporting
your observation to the Air Force.
Sincerely,

PHOTO JOURNALISM
25,
Major Hector Quintanella Jr.
Wright Patterson Air Force Base
Dayton, Ohio
Dear Magor Quintanella,
After trjing in vain to find an explaination to this photograph
I am sending a print of you. pe you will be able
to explain it to me.
I am a member of the Professional Photographers Amarica and
the National Press Photographers Associatior ently employed
by the local news paper, for Sho. by the local news paper, for Smo.
DATA:Object was flying west to DATA:Object was flying west to east, camera was looking east-south- east, camera was looking east-south-
east; so object was going from right do left in the fram,and east; so object wa from right in the fram,and
was photographed after it reached the far left side of fram. was photograohed af it reached the far left side of fram.
It wad quiet, h It wad quiet, hi ing, fast,and made no con trail; but ing, fast,and made no con trail; but
ofcourse the pattern that appers anound it was not there to
the naked eye. The sun was behind me. This is not a double
exposure. You may keep exposure. You may keep this print if you like. this print if you like.
Film; Kodacrome Type Film; Kodacrome Type F 35mm 35mm
éilter; Daylight color corection) éilter; Daylight ( color corection)
(Kodak Pony lV; Camera
Date; June 6,1960
Time; 7:55 P.M.
Place; Courner of Columbia and Pearl st.,Union City, Indiana.
I personaly have given up trying to explain the pattern that
developped on the film and hope you can help me.
Thank you,

PHOTO ANALYSIS REPORT 66-32
NR DATE OF REPORT 1 AUgUSt 1966
SUBJECT UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT
LOCATION UNION CITY, INDIANA DATE 6 JUNE 1960
PHOTOGRAPHY
AF IR QUALITY =
PNRS
1 color print (5 X 7), letter from M
1. PURPoSE: This report is a joint response by the Photo Processing and Photo Analysis
Divisions to Work Order Number 66-6l from Major H. Quintanilla, Jr. (TDEW/UFO) who requested
photo analysis of one color print taken in Union City, Indiana on June 6, 1960 by
2. 2. ANalisls: No dlscernible object can be identiiied on tne attacned pnotograph. ANALYSIS: No discernible object can be identified on the attached photograph. The Ihe
light colored areas on the photograph could have been caused by sun flare. light colored areas on photograph could have been caused by sun flare.
PHOTO AN PHOTO APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY:
Erlda.Sekia Erald A. Sekina Richard L. Chance Richard s. Chance
GERALD SCHEIMAN RICHARD L. CHANCE
Intelligence Research Specialist Capt, USAF
Chief, Photh Analysis Division Chief, Photh Analysis Division
WILBER PRICE,
Director,
Photo Exploitation Directorate
D APR 62 FORM 132

June6,1960
ENGINEERING SUPPORT WORK REQUEST
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS X PHOTO ANALYSIS MACHINE COMPUTATION
PPT NUM8ER: A6010301
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: /
Request photo analysis be performed on the attached
in this print.
REFERENCE MATERIAL: One colored print, letter 25 Apr 66.
Request all material be returned upon completion of ,
analysis.
REQUESTED BY MAH SYMBOL TDEW/UFO
I CERTIFY THAT THIS WORK IS AUTHORIZED BY ME AND THAT IT HAS THE FOLLOWING PRIORITY AND
DEADLINE WITHIN MY DIVISION.
27May66
PRIORITY DEADLINE DATE SIGNATURE OF APPROVING DIVISION CHIEF DATE
ENGINEERING SUPPORT MONITOR. ASSISTANT
FINAL WORK TO BE IN FORM OF :
ENGINEERING NOTE COMPUTATION PI REPORT DRAWING PROGRAM
WORK REQUEST APPROVED BY: DEADLINE DATE.
PRIORITY NUMBER ONE TWO THREE
WORK ORDER NUMBER
FORM

I2T
ata
Thi cave inludo one l) 5%" Thi cave indlude on li)5%7"
coler phatoglogh. coler phitogtogh.
CH301064Y

1
1
'