PROJECT BLUE BOOK

UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT CASE FILES · 1947 – 1969

CASE REFERENCE6972653

DATE OF SIGHTINGJanuary 1958

REPORTED LOCATIONChattanooga Tennassee

FRAMES5

→ Original microfilm scan (PDF) → Return to index

Machine transcription · mean legibility 40.9/100 · engines: tesseract-200dpi

Transcribed Frames

FRAME 001 / 005tesseract-200dpi

No Pia ore:

wba

a et

PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD

Was Astronomical Veteor

Insufficient Deta for Evaluction

1. DATE 2 LOCATION 12. CONCLUSIONS
oO Le ety
“+ Jan 38 Chatta feast e 20 QO Probably Balloon
3. DATE-TIME GROUP 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION OD Pessidly Balloon
O Was Aircraft
Local = — — 2KGround- Vi sual O Ground-Radar |Q Probabiy Aircraft
omt__09/01i87 0 Air Visual O Air-intercept Radar | 9 Possibly Aircroft
SB. at. Cl”. ee Oe, a
O Yes O Probably Astronomical
DB No Civilian O Possibly Astronomical
7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | @. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | 9. COURSE “10 Other
0
= 0 Unknown
- 4 Secs = ae 22 hot piven s _
10. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING 111. COMMENTS
hong oval obj, larger than the full Possible meteor. Duration,
Ion, Which was also visible, fiee: reneral description & flight
red. Looked as if it hit the earth, path conform j

ATIC FORM 329 (REV 76 SEP $2)

‘ .4 . -' 7 a .
¥ this analysis,

FRAME 002 / 005POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

nD re Pet rere ae cee re err a ——

YT a |
‘
.
4
(ie: _y)
: u™~
li aw
-“\
- ~ i + Fy aes ,
~ we - ‘ ’ & = otf Ae
7 . i o> ede eae | t= , . t. ) Ob rads emo | Tt a.
. a oad Wr Ra Pt. £8 Gah D3 EJs.
. _- I A
oe é+ & PY J, n
“te oF * . Tee tee 3
te sd wed’ ~ o & tel ~ 7
“+e a a . - ee
Sa ice Rd. 10 LOH ‘ ~ Vic

Se

Fg ret ye erry ee Y a. So

OS/OMA- Ee .

—— <— eee (

-- - @ .
Te’ Comoe Ay;k Tech BaTel Cen.
S7he bine Fares SHOULD REAL LARGIER THAR
Bier Si THe, Sava TIM: |

FRAME 003 / 005POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

So, 30%
Ce UNLIMITED

he 22 MITES

atc \
‘se SNk hice
—-
“
_ & '»-
~ : "mec

@® s.:*
’

- “ys
“¢ ai
_
es ~*
6

WT Seca aa at ek bit eke  idiba Taal,

PBI, eR Pet ares 2
‘ =

an i ees pa
: 4 c i

\
16

4 |

}
—

‘ FSS ‘Re
/ : - -
eae

ed
‘
-—}

FRAME 004 / 005POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

2 PE NE IT ial Gin omeaiiniiniiaatianl ee ee ee Lie

‘ery

ll: ye oy

YOY ws to
6 ya te aw
rene, a
sa ie ‘ - .\
¢ ¥¢ G @) J Nie : .
\ é
seas - ») "
De LAi : Ra : se oF Oe Sans Te oy \ ) ab Ps rf ie ie
Oy FREY Ph
aes #9 :
- @ we . . f
a ® 9 ee Pe
** 4 a PE ’ P (* t- 2
-@ -« 7 f ‘fp ey ( ‘
> a, Pans Mer OS
oot vr /
> etn 7 e ;
j ® - * ® ' jews
o ares <, lr } D }
ter Tete 2 t j
’ \
‘ ar ae ~
He FGM 7 4 wee &
’ me . ALS
I. NOME i, aa
™ ae i f : -) |
-— . -_—e -a* — ih Bel < ' 4
[\2e DESCRIPTION GF COUFSis 6 *
— ‘ <i | ¢ 7? Lee A- aL
La ee - ow. 7 } F Le 7 ; Nd a
he JOOKING AT S’’Y \ } bi [ Ar yn ao
“a h | oe ~~. { 7 a
Be NOITHVEST LOU oF HorIcc! we. WS a
- . NT ' ‘ > ee r gaa |
SS eee a mY Nee aby wn oe nm
Ce J.C rs f |? ee J We | é L.ie " wel
al
. ‘
Sig STRAIGHT FIGGHI FAskee— a Me eae :
ae
- rye | = Dus fOr st i Po tie
o : . | a ay eo cat }
Fé THREE TO FOUR Si COND

Le ee

3 MANNSE OF OBSERVATIONS
Ae GROUND VISUAI.
2. MNO AIT?

—<s)
ef)
I
1
oe

fy
wv

fie oD oe 4.32
Se PAE: |
{
‘ ‘f a
Se LOCATION OF nS) 4
~~

ae. —<
“
iTH vad E201 GI E“AV F

——_

;
UL

[i

» xg «

FRAME 005 / 005POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

Spt eS 0 Oe eee ater ee eae . 7yre* ee t
.
]
— — --- —
“> ~ - ** ee _™- -¢ e =
id “Ber
~ - - - + t+
_ .-. - - . a he - wx - - ? BE
: a Se ae | t - to hh
-~ - - *- my
- « & ay 5 _
ol
- -—-
Lon mY - > ’ nw be » i ie f
y r — = . _ + aV
~~ ~~ - - - . L
~ 7 ‘*- - -- -_ a er «+ « =
’ >» ¥ .
ww « ~ ee *- m-. w - + i -'** * seared
. - ** a T 77
e & - _-. i (or LS Ye | -* C *s ~
. ™, id '™ ¢ + ™ ** - , -
2 Y ~ e *% ; e CS a as 7 ey ¥
o
**.* ei , ‘ = 09 > _s "ee? " al oar e tf -=
~~ - = 4 ‘ ~ o -

_ dew imanehaie eer

-

LLL LL, I NR ES el

- dav 3 83: 49758

a “<* ee . ‘ater re ree ‘
eS DI, Rae | ee s- SAF eke

-

ee ee eee

’
i
.
« s . ¢
j
+
‘
.
‘ ‘
,
.
-
4
F
‘