PROJECT BLUE BOOK

UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT CASE FILES · 1947 – 1969

CASE REFERENCE6963670

DATE OF SIGHTINGJuly 1957

REPORTED LOCATIONNorway

FRAMES20

→ Original microfilm scan (PDF) → Return to index

Machine transcription · mean legibility 49.9/100 · engines: tesseract-200dpi

Transcribed Frames

FRAME 001 / 020tesseract-200dpi

PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD

i. DATE 2. LOCATION 12, CONCLUSIONS
} 19 Was Boilloon
sat aul 1S; | Norwa 0 Probably Balloon
ve om ——_ —_ “ = -_ ; :
3. DATE-TIME GROUP 4 TYPE OF OBSERVATION DB Possibly Belleen
_ : = c Nos Aircre
Lecei & Ground- Vi sual G Ground-Rader 5 Pokakre Rives oft
GM > a! ! 0D Ais Vi wal O Air-intercept Redor {¥ Possibly Aircroft
S&S PROTCS | > SOURCE ;}o Wes Astronomical
G Yes O Prebably Astronomical
"1 Ne s2 O Possibly Astronomical
- = —- : — ee
7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 8. NUMBER OF CBJECTS | ?. COURSE i ..Other. P
j O itneufticient Deta for Evoivation |
| i 0 Unknown
9. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING ry - it}. COMMENTS :
3 OD tO aiter Cc nad | The ov} sul
fe G Ss not t |diffusion es ¢t .
Te! t > | - 4 _~-"

ATIC FORM 129

-—_—_

(REV 26 SEP $2)

FRAME 002 / 020POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

7

Ur0 ANALYSIS LHOrT

Location_ Nocway , =- a

— one ee et es -

Date Rtrhey oo 7. _ Hour Ox ; 4 FIO

——S -_-— — ome ee —o one

2 ete we + . ee i

WX ee eee Wanda, ‘is Sas, tS I Se oe ee

-Deseription Ses Pr yrerccenry7 Ave FRAN SPARES Y — .

—— — ee ee teem 6 sk a re es — -~ _——
_~_——_—_ —_— —= _ ~ a eee ee eee we
— —- _s_ + - - — oe oe

Direction of Motion AsEWwE -—

_—-- _ — ——

Satellite: (AFCINelF3, Fhone 69219) or ot a

Radar Analysis (AFCIN-)51) 2 ————"_ 7
Natural Phemomena (Ball Lightning, etc) _ —— _ anton
Zircreft, Balloons, Airships, etc, eee —— a  _

-__—
Other Sw OfvEC7~ PABBA S TO  @ESats—~ ARO Ae

danscekbezytcd 00) 99 CASS TARO — AIC TPS PT?

Evaluation of Source Ral lability POSASiY <gvI2o-——

—
Anel ysis ana Conch isions: AOE QLVEC?” 7 sae pad CLS at Lice
Di teusionrN =) > Tree ocr)’ S itAty —_ rears Treo wzwe ev aA—-)
iMPpeerecrno sd ti) ECLAss.. 1 re Cv y Ec APPEARS Jeu
OF e0UCuU> FEL X&C. PALC it Cho SEL. oO 7-ME CM CCA ee ee,
SWE CAMO SCAPS. . “Fores cOULO AAVR PEE NOreteI eR MORES
Tar ” FiAiA vO Text 2rlard CHAALER. Air TAME ee el
ew Sor h. Csie7 } a a 44t
PALj4O TUYA RIES OF 9 SPEcrAe S tseTrao~w oe
— *y - : a a J ee
Corad wr Le at TR TF oe (10 uA Bas | Vt = A ee aad “FF
on af . Pg |
-£ “we = PeeTo's TA <£A) THReAGCHT 4-154 at
a i : —- - A t.ho” _

-, AF '

FRAME 003 / 020tesseract-200dpi

In August 1959 an Arherican tourist in Norway snapped a picture
of a group of houses on a cliff above the seacoast, and was amazed
to Rud some time later that the print showed a large white, dough-
nut-shapéd object hovering in the sky above the coast. Puzzled by
this apparent evidence of a fying saucer that was visible to the
Carmnera but mot to | er. sh . submitted the fact sto \T i( Wmvesiuga
Thorough tndy « f the nezative. the camera, be ssible sources
reflection in the landscape at the time the photograph was taken
ali failed to account for the mysterious intruder. Obviously not

; '
’

’
cloud, the image closely resernbled a smoke ring, but the photogra-
ther had not been smoking and there were no sources of smoke in
the neighborhood. The experts were baifed unti] one of them

thought of a new possibility and again questioned the witness: had

3

.
’

she by any ch
She had—a sparkling diamond. If the angle of the sun, the direction

‘ . , P r)
ance been wearing a ring when she took the picture?

she was facing. and the position of her ring finger in relation to the
camera lens and to the stun had been exactly right, the annular
image would have been refiected into the lens at the instant she

sy '
vould look exactly

mS

snapped the ricture. The resulting bright rin
like the UFO that appeared on the negative [1].

-—-

ee mee eee

ee eee

FRAME 004 / 020POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

(no machine-readable text on this frame)

FRAME 005 / 020POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

-- ~e=

. 0 4
World Roundup

—

’ -.
”

Saucer photographed over Norway

~—_

he never saw it!

‘\/ D\\ IN Peals Loy \Irs \; than feel nm oPurrett. of Grea Boeri rhe) \ Tass ct ct a

fl
Bwuson a cruise io Norwedian waters with the Stella Maris. tac one ashore in Nonws \f
1} koa photograph of a Hiord—she cannot now remendber the non fir TH file,
was net developed tor same time afterwards and then. to her amazement. this sanecer. Uhving ter
with rrific bean of Hight emanathie from it appeared onthe print’ \tr Barrett, who icf
init ft ridom reeenth. told eryvixc saucer review that she had not seen pace ship ual
scl ail t © counted se it the time was the actual view f ti bicorel cared arrmne litears cis three Lens
raw taking the picture. Mrs. Barrett said) ther is " Pat all
, 5 -» = “Fr . . . . \ \ . . ANY \
GLOWING OBJECT OVER GERMAN TO
4 “ ‘ , ‘ +) , ’ ° vit .
ty : t thes
> . ’ ' ’ ' ‘ ’
: , ‘

FRAME 006 / 020POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

ERVICES
FICcd oe Bene A bred me)
OFFICE afi

<n wrth ae

RoE
ARTMEBE™ en THE Air Fo
LE PAr

| aie aa le
tae

W AsHveToed D.C

FRAME 007 / 020POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

ASSTFIED

’
;
:

c

-_-.

CHNOLOGY DIVISION, AFSC

r
L

FOREIGN 11

FRAME 008 / 020tesseract-200dpi

FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION AFSC UNCLASSIFIED

UPNCLASSIFIED

FRAME 009 / 020tesseract-200dpi

UNCLASSIFIED

FRAME 010 / 020POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

UNCLASSIFIED

FOREIGH TECHNOLOGY DIVISION AFSC

**
-
:
‘. ais
: *. .
a
* ts
a 6
ws Se
S- -
ee 7G e - .
a > :
3 weet e
* Aases os ’
Fo he eae
: =. Haein is .
 *-*? ~ - tre
ee
; " : ‘$y
"40
yt = 4 a
; gay, et?
& =) he
S Sas ya
~ wed ‘ .
- ¢ -
« -
YS oa, -
,
.
 .
er
“m4

ee | a c | om
. < -

~-
_

.

a
<a >
*

-

-

FRAME 011 / 020POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION, AFSC UNCLAS

*%

if
Vw

IFIED

—* 7.
re teas .
: a +
- —, 5 Pe . b - ih e ' ‘
2.7 - - . . ~
>, Set <e Be ite SS
’ +3 ‘ . - '
; ul > > a + ’ rie
“*Ognay.* gt Wr «4 ¢ ‘
4 eee ® Neh” : Natt i alt
y, a“, Aa + "atch ¢ ~ +
fay 5 = Ay ,
. . 7 ? Wak Det
. é - :
‘ et: >»:
« - ® °
oe f

FRAME 012 / 020POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

AAP

EASTIV

es

¢..

A Vat

wir #7)

ry
ant
us
“>
=A
.
.
+
mn 2 }
= 4
> 5,
rr? -
> ih
tt
|
> ;
.
@¢

ee &
OQ WO

ya
4 42
4
a
,
-
é __
%
** . .
— ,
, i

Ww )

oe

ome -d

Pantan

vd

ove
‘

:

at

,
.
ee
‘
.
‘
.
.
4
yy °
t
t "
»t
‘
:
’
. ‘

4
<=

a

te

FRAME 013 / 020POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

Na

sek

Lig n
o bmn egeo nes edd,

, eS 2:
ana eo” SS ee ae ee SEP SS
¢ : ~~ : ¥.

rad ~~ . n<
et A le tle

vot &

FRAME 014 / 020POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

au

y)

MONT

=

- NORTH EGR

SKY FARM

oe
of
4
>
_
4
-4
-
7
2. ah)
) >”
.
{) fu
i.) . gual
A i=]
.

lon) “4
«+ .
»e- re) .
oh ow h
b a4
me <7 f+
> tH ix
\ oO @
_ fi)

y*
~~*

co
cr
—s

ta

AY

?

“nr
ce.

ws

.
“Ar
o. ;
>
e—! ft)
D oo
@, ci
;? ’
 §&
ow
ont om
££
>
a
‘
© *
la
4
© »
ot ot
t)
G)
a
o =
cy
cS uf}
> on
\ ‘
wrt
hy
m4 ¢)
1
at y
) .
ry .
1% oO
re
i)
et @
A
>
“ip
‘
rot he
Ho
ore |
et TY
»« @)
,4)
.
>
oy
.
,
;
4
e-4
rt oo
‘
it} a4

~?
oud
‘
. .
ef
r
s 4
m7
‘
. ‘
‘
o
.
1 5:
"
~
. ¢€
Si O
.
~
bi
. )
> ct
‘2
a
mm |
a’ «“
J
7
iw 4
—
.
at
D a
agent 1)
©) «
' :
het
" e
a
:
Cc iH,
“
‘
-_
-

J
‘
-* %
i
>
5
4
2
<4

— =

~
st nh

-

=)
ee & he

i

;
or -4 -
€ ™ 7}
? = ®
4 OO «tl
f
i :
anu
Me
ym *
. . fr)
= { se
mo
. ‘
FE uMrel
by “)
hi
42 .
Oo m
ef
‘ ~?
, : ,
4 >
? ot
{> +2 f.
=, aw Qa
%),
cm
«al ad a |
sa
“i bt
0 U @
; en
Oo & @
; mM
‘Mh. @
Hi we
on &
bP 1 ad
oO

4. ;
@
® b&
‘
oq «6D
i
etry
\
ot
: i
‘
e ' >
'
=}

—
ie
uO
- u hy
Ory oO
, __ -
eW
oO
7) a
it by
Om
oO 0O O
ot Si ort
md | su

= f-3

5

J ~

= at "

Le ‘
fn

= 1)
;
CS

i c=

co} O

mn 4 Sa

- 2?
' cy

>

| 4,*
= t)

;

4 ;
> ie)

wt \ qa
'- ;
ett -

=
°°
, ‘
Re .
i
ry
.
Y
4
¢)
r*
-
-
-
.
~
oo
*
+ =o
;
- ’
; '
ro |
~*
. ‘)
+
.
,*
.
4
,
-
“<4

a 5

FRAME 015 / 020tesseract-200dpi

AIR TECHNICAL INTELLIGENCE CENTER
UNITED STATES AiR FORCE
WRIGHT-P ATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE
OHIO

om
n

- . WAT Tyo
AL. ; OFS APU Liam che ly

SUBJECT: Fhotograph of UFO (‘ri ~—__—_—7Z_iii iia
TO: S153 On), Se)

. le In order to assist the ATIC with evaluation and/or interpretation
of the photo taken by Mrs. Barrett, the following information ta
requested:

Be Time e

b. Date.
e. Direction in which picture was taken.

rey
Wi

peed at which photo was taxea.
e. Type caera.
f. Was tness alone or with others.
Ke titude.

ge one a ae ae

NICHULAS Post 1 Atech

Siiscent Dent; Cy Ltr dtd 6 Tune $9
at

oe _

. . = ——— . > ' .
Science and C ents nr oe,

— = —-— we

~~ ee

— a -

—

FRAME 016 / 020tesseract-200dpi

1. «Atvecked is a photograph teken by rs. “QRWMmes cf Crea:

rringtom, Massachusetts. The witness states that when waking the
photo she saw only iandseape in the finder. Cowever, tire picture
when developed snowed a bright circular imase.

»

2. Your comments and/or analysis of this photograch ere requested.

3. Mrs. Belem haa requested thet wo return “he colored print te
Ber on the completion of our study. iI is reyuested treat as muca
care as aueseesful completion of your malysis «ill cllow de civen
: this photograph.
ke A copy of Mrs. SQRRMMMMM letter is attached for additional
iaformation.
VIN EV? GO. RETHMAN 2 Ateoh
Colonel, USA? 1. Color Photo
APC LW Bh 2- Cy ltr dtd 6 Tune 59
fr ‘rs. Barrett
3 4A
| 62h7) Meare
. AVEC? —~ (Sp SF
y f G

FRAME 017 / 020POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

Cr

FICE OF THE SECRETARY

Your letter addressed to
4 +

ferred to the

has been refer:

a
? yf. f fa:
’
‘ Se
j
) ~
ano le
hk gz = *37
the i esul

f

- . ~ “we Vs
ve. si gence Lo —

-
mon’,

——_

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

WASHINGTON

nter for analys

iZ2ve
rT ~ ate ie Ta | _ oa — — | ~ -_
- zeC¢ +> oe de ee - whe . LS wt he
Cl. - 4 = «skh 4 ab = +m 4 .

- ILCe “ a we Fak ee DO wt ws

~ t &
ness @.one OFT wivuh

the evaluation is completed
you and return your photo.

tw

incerely,

.
_—_ =

Executive

ee ee ae F

Massachusetts

‘D

7
y

,

he sede
Se
» se
Jee
.+
> wil

me he OF
~ Tannnt es)

ye
7 2 <
+ iQrwara

—

FRAME 018 / 020tesseract-200dpi

29 June 1959

REPLY TO
ATTN OF: AFCINehDia

SUB5ST: Photograpa of UPTO (hrs, gees)

TO: ATCINehShz

oO

le Ths subject photography has been examined but no conclusion can
be reacasd as to the cause of the apparent image, Possible causes
are: defective photographic material, an accident of processing,
an insdvartent double exposurs, or some sort of reflection if the
photeazreoh was taxen through a window,

2. It is suggested that the photograph be shown to axperts at

Eastman Kodak to assess the /posgibility of defective film, faulty
processing, or lens refjéc vicns,

aA

~~ VFLBER PRICE, Lit ft l Atch

Chisf 1. Color Photo
/

APC INeiDa

_—

FRAME 019 / 020tesseract-200dpi

CO sry amh 9 ; ) '
J » Weil id i vw

. - . tr -<
Najor Lawrence J, Tacker, USA?
~ecutiv tficer
7 — ° . os
istic Information Division

isi
Crfetes of Informetion Services -- Office of the Secretary
Department ox the Air For

washington, D. SC.

~-
WSaPr Sil}

Ts enelosirs a letter written by you to >> <i - ATs.

‘<7 BParm, North Exremont, Massachusetts, with reference to her letter

oe on it - aw, ~— +" -\ a ~~} A ~ “~ Ds ~s
from the editor of the Swedish Magazine, FrARTHENON
Cederstromsratan

Halsingbdors, Sweden
asking for a scovvy of this nhotograph, and a film. In his letter
he states that a friend of his durinz a vacation in Germarnylast

summer--1958--nhad a somewnat similar experience. One day he said

he saw a circle cf a stron= beam of light in the sly.
In your letter you state that as soon as tne «valuation is

plete you will forward the results to Mrs, Qp and return

‘our photerravaA. If your department cares to keep the enclosed
nhotorraoch and fiim, you may do so, as I have had duplicates made

/ : 794° nw a a .397 — m Me >» sr
ner way to London, and therefore IT should like to have x

2D
e,e
4 \ “ .
ee {
the Vv ery, tet. ‘
ncolosures; Letter to: rederic urtiss
. “ye ‘ ” nm +
wy} 1d photomanh

FRAME 020 / 020POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION

ee TQ ee aE