DECLASSIFIEDUSAF PROJECT BLUE BOOK · NARA T-1206
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

PROJECT BLUE BOOK

UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT CASE FILES · 1947 – 1969
CASE REFERENCE6383638
DATE OF SIGHTINGOctober 1952
REPORTED LOCATIONSHAWAFB S C
FRAMES7

Machine transcription · mean legibility 61.7/100 · engines: tesseract-200dpi

Transcribed Frames

FRAME 001 / 007POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION
= ad —

\

er ?'S | { PROJECT 10073 RECORO CARD
— a my ae — Gite

, .
‘
1 Oct 52 SHAW AFB, &.C. {0 Was Bolloon
AS 1) Prebubly Salloon
3. DATE-Time GROUP a TYPE OF OSSERVATION oh Possbly dallonn
EST ,\0 Was Asrceafe
Locel . <v.2° O Ground: Vi sual (3 Ground-Roder ;  Probobly Aircraft
__GMT , | a, HX Air Vi sual  Airtntercept Redar | Posmbly Aircraft
“Sh PHOTOS ay iy SOURCE ‘S am ae yr etn
es a rabably Astronomical
/ XR No | RF-50 Pilot (USAF) io Possibly Astrorericel
J. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION ~=$ 8. NUMBEROF OBECTS | % COURSE i See
i Zz D Insufficient Data for Evaluation
23 min | 1 2K Unknown
Ee ee ee | —
0. GRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING 0% COMMENTS a

Brilliant white light acconplichod
orratic maneuvers. Pilot unable to intor~
cept or contact ground radar.

|
4
., (AOFz
: \\ hfs 3% s
Ves : ‘ 3

ee Se ee. er ee le we +l

aTic enew +76 reer 14 8PP 4H
FRAME 002 / 007tesseract-200dpi
pi
HEAD WARTERS

ISTH TACTICAL RECOMNAISSANCE GROUP
Shaw Air Force Pase
South Carolina

ROC/I 360 | 3 October 1952
SU3SJECT: Report of Sishting of Unconventional Aircraft

TOs Commanding General
Air Materiel Comrand
ATTN: MCIS
Wriveht-Patterson Air Force Base
Dayton, Ohio

1. In accordance with AF Ltr. AFOIC-CC-1, dated © Sentember 1950,
the following revort of Simhting of Unconvent’onal Aircraft is submitted:

@. Descrintion: A brilliont white lictht, three tines as in-
tense as the stars, of sharp contrast, vrilliance not diminishing toward
edzes, with no halo or radation; circular in shape, and commaralive size
approximately one (1) inch in diameter, No discernible aerodynamic
features, trail or exhaust, propulsion systen or sound, Speed undeter
mined, but considerably greater than sizg:ting aircraft. Ov ject exhibited
following maneuvers: Horizontal flight, vertical flicsht, stil) flicht,
gentle turns, abrupt turn and dive. Sighting aircraft lost contact with
object in maneuvering to avoid another aircraft.

lat J)
4 tm fF
b. Object was sizhted at 1657 fours, Eastern Standard time,
1 October 1952, and remained in visual contact unt'l avproxiuetely 1920

hours, EST.

oe #7

c. Object was observed frou one RF-SO aircraft traveling at
270 MPU indicated at 22,000 feet MSL during first oart of contact, and
at. time of disaonearance sithting aircraft was indicating 370 MPH at
16,000 feet MSL. '

d. Iocation of sishtins aircraft: 34° 08'n - 80° 34'y on
heading of 060° at time of sizhtinz and renained on above headirg for

ayoroximately 10 minutes. Object anneared to left of aircraft's nose at aN
an unknown distance, passed in front of aircraft's nose at 2 o'clock
position, cane to what apveared to be a complete stop, reswied flight Ly

in onpnosite direction passing in front of aircraft, cowinz to a ston at

19 otclock to the sighting aircraft. Odject remained slicthtly below \)
altitude of sishtins aircraft during entire contact, “.
‘

a
aad io

-—
©
©
jw
Ww
—
|
FRAME 003 / 007tesseract-200dpi
roc/I 360
SU3SECT: Report of Sizhting of Unconventional Aircraft

e, There were no known witnesses or other observers. Object

sighted by, lst. Lt. Thomas J. Piontek, Rated Pilot of four (4) years
experience with annroximately 1100 flying hours, is a veteran of combat
operations in the Korean War, is at present assivned the additional duty
of Assistant Squadron Intelligence Officer, 155th Tactical Reconnaissance

Squadron, is considered to be a hicshly qualified reconnaissance vilot
and a sober and reliable officer,

f. Weather durinz neriod was clear with a full moon, (Teletype
Sequence attached as Incl #1). :

g No physical evicence of object is available.

h. Pilot attemoted to interceot object after second pass in
front of sighting aircraft, by cutting in front of path of object and
increasing power to 100% but was unable to close on object. Pilot also

attempted to alert ground radar unit for electronic observation of object
but was unsuccessful,

POR THE CO MANDING OFFICER:

—kepy-

1 Incl: R. Le KINSQON
Teletyne Sequence Cantain, USAF
Adjutant
Info Copys
CS
Ninth Air Force
ATTN: DOT

Pope AF3, WN. C.
FRAME 004 / 007tesseract-200dpi
AAP Om Te

, 2 Bay WEATHER DETACHMENT
‘ ( SHAN AIR FORCE EASE, SUX CAR{ NA

2 YVCTVEER 1452

SUBJECT EXTRACT OF WBAN FORMS 10A aD 10B, 1 OCTOBER 1952

L 1900 O 8 (CLLAR, VISIBILITY 8 STATUTE NILES)
LOCAL UBSERVATIVUN 190UE

I CERTIFY TiAT THt ABU VE EXTRACT IS A TRUE AND LAACT CoPY ANL THAT
THE EXrLANATIGN IN PARENTHLSZS IS THE CoRRiCT INTERPRETATION

1ST LT USAF
FoRECASTER

TS52-/7760

ee

EE IE I LE SES th I TN NE LL he Se ee
-Tor

- a ee ee
FRAME 005 / 007POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION
: / " "° .
ear, . PROJET 20073 woRY Er .
I, GENERAL

pie Déis

'
Jicf és fe ee

OO Wiss IECT ans EHV yx ee 7 Ce

) Nakod Eye
i_] Binoculars ’
| ‘ ; (J telescope

C1 Theodolite
LJ Yus (A
LIBy Ons Sot
CJ By Two Sets
‘|By Three Sets
OM THE AIK You
~LA/C Observed Object
(Wintorveption Attempted |
C1No Intorcopt Attempted
“J. Wes AIRCRAFT SCRAMBLED TO INTERCE Li Yes “Eto
__A/C Scrambled ui
Uj) Visual Contact Made
CIA/I Contact Made
[_}No Contact Mads test
16, Did OBJECT CHANGE DINSCTION AT ANY TIME? =—SCaGLYess—“i‘i‘“‘COUO;~*#®!®#®W!W!W!#~}WWFUC~«w
Normal
[Violent

¥. iF OnJuCT WAS A "LIGHT", WAS IT: _) Blinking
s fStondy 732-4 fem det |
0. ' ‘ts

5. WAS OBdeCT OBSERVED BY GROU

—_~—

- ower =

—o_—-—

{| d=15 Seconds
(} 1-5 Minutes
er 10 Minutes 25 enw utes

| 13. Y OR e ae ‘ RCH DOWN ARC 1} Yes 0
; ik. DLD OBJECT HA {1 Yes —— ee
15, Did ORECT-APFEM fo BYSUNTEORATET — | Yes io
“\6. TIVe OF SIGHTING RELATIVE TO SUNRISE OR SUNSET (wats From Alr Almanac) |
| Getiight
; ! Day
| UC: Sunrise
{ ' Sunset “7
III. AIRCRAFT DATA :
“7. WERE AIRCRAFT NOTeD IN AREA?  ¢)Yes i... ;.
;

| 'iOne Aircraft
, (_}¥ora Than One Aircraft

18. WAS ANY SOUND HEARD? 7 a) Std a =e
TIS. WEE WHERE INDICAVICHS OF WGI TACHEROUNI NOISE? gn C3No
"20. WAS ‘tHe OBJECT VikweD ROVE L5o ELEVATION? ""_‘>fes [iio

ATIC Test Form 334 (13 Aug 52)
FRAME 006 / 007POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION
ry 7 . ENS 7
: Yeo
{ .
° . i vr 3B?
( IV. BALLOON DA .
2 J7eERe BALLOONS RELEASED IN ARE “Ld {63 fae
ay SINCE SCHEDULED E ON HELEASE ¥ ere —— 4
22, TIME NCE SCHEDULED BALLOON HE " & +5 1 nutes ;
» POSSIBLE BALLOON LAUNCH SITES DOWNWIND OF SIOGHTINGs
Describe
Lighting

————_—_—- —_ —_——_——_—

rth

[ ] Insufficient to Evaluate

("] Was Astronomical
(_] Probably A. - nomical
[_] Possibly A: i...nomical

("]Was Aircraft CJother: «ss
(Cl]Probably Aircraft
’ [)Possibly Aircraft [_] Insufficient Data For Evaluation
Yonknown

{
WT eat es TS es BS

!
i

— ——
FRAME 007 / 007POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION
\.

wig ("PROJECT 10073 WEATHER TA SHf
1. DATE OF OBSERVATION . Tink OF OBSERVATION > STATION OKSLRVING = = =
( heal —_—
_2v-f- £2 J eOk | Aa A,
he WINDS ALOFT?§ 2 kk ena eS eee eee ee
ALTITUDE VELOCITY DIRECTION |[. ALTITUDE VELOCITY | DIRECTION
- nots __(degrogs) || (feot knots teed

— ewe es ere —_—a—,

35,000

; oe + ae
= (a=
!
0
a bet
5080 a
6,000 "55,000 . ats,
= et
en
10,000 —— 95,000
oe ty :

_— wwe en we ew

80, 000

85,000

a 9,0
a 95,0
i =<

5. WAS AN INVERSION LAYER NOTED? ~ CyYes
(Ir yes, at what altitude? al

§. WERE ANY THUNDERSTORMS NOTED IN AREA? CT¥es
(If yes, at what quadrant? sss =. — ee

7. CLOUD COVER:

8. VISIBILITY WAS
tenths at feet. tenths at feet. 5 MILES
tenths at _ feet. tenths at oe :

ee a! rs : ee eee we + ee

“A
Chea w "

—* Oe ee re ee Ee EP 6 a ne — er re ee

Aiic Tost Form 333 (13 Aug 5