DECLASSIFIEDUSAF PROJECT BLUE BOOK · NARA T-1206
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
PROJECT BLUE BOOK
UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT CASE FILES · 1947 – 1969
CASE REFERENCE6383633
DATE OF SIGHTINGSeptember 1952
REPORTED LOCATIONATLANTICOCEAN
FRAMES3
Machine transcription · mean legibility 67.8/100 ·
engines: tesseract-200dpi
Transcribed Frames
FRAME 001 / 003POOR LEGIBILITY — PENDING RE-EXAMINATION
i”
PROSE CT tors RECGRE Caro
-_- &—~ .. than ry’ o «© 6@ <6. | - _ oe <= +<e, ee ee " “( he « o . _ i)
- Oats Ltca "os iS CGN ww 30
30 Sep 52 _ ATLANTIC OCEAN S Was Saloon
: 7 . ee Say ¢
2. “wate? we we Gate /* TY*E oF SASERWAT ner] 6 SBS:
sy e+ sas
; ‘ one ‘ ; tg Bisnis a_ a3 2 arr t
Se DEB sees crs eee. i 5 e-s 0 ena anaes =x wat Sale v. sata: - ‘lili Rada i“ *~Bas; y Aree. Gs?
‘
. ——_— er re ee ee
dil }
J
v
.
J
= -
of
awe ’?
-
-
7
—— ee + ee Oe ee eee
‘ 3 . 2 - ,
" Py . ’ S: cis « S* et
out Ain 4 ws Gi Areintepeept %2ecr ~ " .
——— ee ee ee ee See ee ee ee
—_— * as _—_—-- ——— - ———— = oe Hn ee eee ee mee — « -*. : ae “mess ——— rr et ee me _- “ ,
s Be srast & sou. A. was Awedar
or ae se eed aa &4° ore}
,
‘ ‘
-~* “42%: . * |
=x. Coast Guard
. = . _ - * ey - . y ma agi - , _ - SF - ses "4 . > r = - 7 - —
s 7 *. ” haa «=! se - ‘\ feiae ~ s aaette: 5S
‘ Pp Py . or
'
: a me a |
: One
_ Luminous greyish dise appsared in a break bee 1. This sighting iliustraves Ace expire
‘ode p + ;
tyecn Sunes which were at estimatad altitude denced military wan can be fooslea Ly
1 of 5006 Sbjost estimated to be 5-600! in light phenomena, ard it may be a —_ ~0
p Borat novered between the clouds a few many other sightings of this sor
| mimates then started movin slowly, rapidly
| tres sasing its speed to approx 500 mph.
—— sere
eee ee ee ee er eee ‘©
avis reo@mM 14 HEV zo oy
> el dite ee 6 eee ee © Oe eee) ee Gee me ce mee om <«& « a Geo <> <a es-e
TT
2 eI te ee ee = a ee ee ee ee ee
mee
FRAME 002 / 003tesseract-200dpi
. , / /
.UNITED STATES COAST GUARD yy
ADONESS REPLY TO:
COMMANDANT
U. BS. COAST GUARD
HEADQUARTERS
WASHINGTON 23, ©. C.
From:
To:
Subj:
l.
Encl:
fe in
23 December 1952
Commandant .
Chief, Air Technical Intelligence Center,
Wright - Patterson Air-Force Base, Ohio
Flying saucer, possible explanation of one instance
A copy of subject report is forwarded far your information.
_/ Ww. DeMAR
By direction
Pd
NUM seeen
FRAME 003 / 003tesseract-200dpi
30 September, 1952
From: Commanding Officer, TANEY (WPG-37)
To: # Commandant (0)
Via: Commander, 12th Coast Guard District (0)
Subj: Flying saucer
l. One night recently, while on Ocean Station UNCLE, members of this
ship observed an apparition in the sky which bore resemblance to what have
been reported in the press and elsewhere as “flying saucers". Since it
was possible on this occasion to identify the cause of this phenomenon, it
is considered that a report of the incident may be of some interest.
2. At the time, there was a broken cloud layer at about 5,000 feet,
with mo mood. Suddenly, there appeared in the sky, at about the level of
the clouds, a lwiimous, greyish disc. It looked to be avout 5-600 feet
in diameter and seemed to hover { & position about two miles from the
ship. ‘The Commanding Officer, who happened to be on the bridge at the tim,
had previously regarded reports of flying saucers with skepticism, but was
then convinced that this was indeed an object of som sort for which there
was no other explanation. After hovering for a while, the object started
moving across the sky, slowly eat first, and then rapidly, reaching an esti-
mated speed of perhaps 500 miles an hour.
3. And then, almost by chance, the cause of the apparition becam evi-
dent through a break in the clouds. At some there or four thousand feet
above the cloud layer an aircraft in transit was seen to be operating a
landing light. The shaft of the beam could be observed where it entered
the clouds from above, but from below there was no evidence whatever of any
source of light. The foot of the beam, as viewed from beneath the clouds,
presented only a sharply delineated form, oval in shape, appearing to have
{ Senesty and substance.
4, Hed the aircraft not been seen, this occurance would have been report-—
ed in good faith as an observation of a flying saucer. All witnesses were
convinced of its authenticity. The explanation set forth above has not been
seen in any of the numerous newspeper’ and magazine articles that have dis-
cussed this subject, but it appears to be a logical explanation for many
cases that are otherwise unaccounted for.
' [> ig suggested therefore tnat this report, or *hea suostance or it,
be rorwarded to the Air Force group currently investigating reports or
flying saucers for such interest or vaiue that it may contain.